Staff perceptions of an NHS military veterans mental health service in the UK: A qualitative evaluation
Talwar, S.; Carlos Osorio, C.; Barslund Blackman, E.; Solomons, S.; Krishnamurthy, J.; Kuhn, R.; Culloty, L.; Greene, T.; Ferrier, S.; Billings, J.
Show abstract
Those leaving military service frequently present with complex psychosocial problems, but military veterans are often reluctant to engage with statutory healthcare provision. Specialist mental health services have recently been established in the UK to specifically support military veterans with their psychological and social wellbeing. We explored the treatment and support provided by the London branch of a military veterans mental health and wellbeing service (Op COURAGE) from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary service team and their partner organisations and collaborators. We conducted semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary service staff and members of their partner organisations and external agencies. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis.?A total of 16 professionals participated in this study, comprising five service staff, eight collaborators and three partner agency participants. Five themes with subthemes were identified, including (1) blended networks, (2) staff inclusivity and sensitivity, (3) spectrum of psychosocial interventions and holistic support, (4) referral mechanisms, and (5) (in)visibility of the service and advertising. Our evaluation highlighted the advantages of a multidisciplinary team and collaborative partnerships to meet the psychosocial needs of veteran and their significant others. We have proposed that service improvement could include increasing advertisement about this specialist service, deepening knowledge about veterans among staff and further involving veterans and key stakeholders in service decisions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 95%
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 94%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 95%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 94%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 94%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 94%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 94%
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 95%
- Emerging models and trends in mental health crisis care in England: a national investigation of crisis care systems 95%
- Implementing Inclusive Online Psychological Support after Stroke: Professional Stakeholder Views from a Qualitative Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.