Back

Neuroplasticity-Based Treatment Prioritization in Major Depressive Disorder: A Two-Cohort Study

Cohen Solal, T.; Amiaz, R.; Maman, M.; Kassner, Z.; Keller, G.; Ben Ami, D.; Jaremko, M.; Aloni, E.; Goldman, O.; Fava, M.; Laifenfeld, D.

2026-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.06.26364759 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Antidepressant selection in major depressive disorder remains trial-and-error, and no biomarker identifies which drug will work for an individual patient. Because neuroplasticity is a convergent mechanism of antidepressant response, we tested whether it could serve as a drug-specific biomarker in patient-derived neurons. Methods: We developed the Neuroplasticity Score (NPS), integrating structural and synaptic features from high-content imaging of patient-derived cortical neurons, and validated it against graded brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) exposure in neurons from 16 healthy donors. NPS was then applied unmodified to 75 antidepressant treatment episodes from 44 patients across two independent retrospective cohorts: 40 episodes from 20 STAR*D participants (Cohort 1; USA multi-site) and 35 episodes from 24 participants at Sheba Medical Center and Geha Mental Health Center (Cohort 2; Israel). Results: NPS increased with escalating BDNF dose (Spearman rho=0.83; P<.001). Response rate rose monotonically across NPS tertiles in both cohorts (trend P=.001 and P<.001). Across all 75 episodes, 84.6% of episodes in the highest NPS tertile responded, compared to 48.0% overall. NPS discriminated responding from non-responding episodes with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 in both cohorts. The pooled odds ratio per 1-SD increase was 6.05 (95% CI, 2.80-13.05; I-squared=26%). Within patients contributing both a responding and a non-responding episode, the highest-scoring drug was the one that worked in 86% of patients (P<.001). Conclusions: Higher antidepressant-induced neuroplasticity in a patient's own neurons corresponded to a higher likelihood of response to that specific drug across two independent cohorts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.