Neuroplasticity-Based Treatment Prioritization in Major Depressive Disorder: A Two-Cohort Study
Cohen Solal, T.; Amiaz, R.; Maman, M.; Kassner, Z.; Keller, G.; Ben Ami, D.; Jaremko, M.; Aloni, E.; Goldman, O.; Fava, M.; Laifenfeld, D.
Show abstract
Background: Antidepressant selection in major depressive disorder remains trial-and-error, and no biomarker identifies which drug will work for an individual patient. Because neuroplasticity is a convergent mechanism of antidepressant response, we tested whether it could serve as a drug-specific biomarker in patient-derived neurons. Methods: We developed the Neuroplasticity Score (NPS), integrating structural and synaptic features from high-content imaging of patient-derived cortical neurons, and validated it against graded brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) exposure in neurons from 16 healthy donors. NPS was then applied unmodified to 75 antidepressant treatment episodes from 44 patients across two independent retrospective cohorts: 40 episodes from 20 STAR*D participants (Cohort 1; USA multi-site) and 35 episodes from 24 participants at Sheba Medical Center and Geha Mental Health Center (Cohort 2; Israel). Results: NPS increased with escalating BDNF dose (Spearman rho=0.83; P<.001). Response rate rose monotonically across NPS tertiles in both cohorts (trend P=.001 and P<.001). Across all 75 episodes, 84.6% of episodes in the highest NPS tertile responded, compared to 48.0% overall. NPS discriminated responding from non-responding episodes with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 in both cohorts. The pooled odds ratio per 1-SD increase was 6.05 (95% CI, 2.80-13.05; I-squared=26%). Within patients contributing both a responding and a non-responding episode, the highest-scoring drug was the one that worked in 86% of patients (P<.001). Conclusions: Higher antidepressant-induced neuroplasticity in a patient's own neurons corresponded to a higher likelihood of response to that specific drug across two independent cohorts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 94%
- Magnetic resonance imaging for individual prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acylcarnitine Metabolomic Profiles Inform Clinically-Defined Major Depressive Phenotypes 95%
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 94%
- Neurocognitive deficits, psychotrauma, and inflammation shape major depressive disorder and its phenome features 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low predictive power of clinical features for relapse prediction after antidepressant discontinuation in a naturalistic setting 95%
- Atypical depression is associated with a distinct clinical, neurobiological, treatment response and polygenic risk profile 94%
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional Profiles in Nucleus Accumbens of Antidepressant Resistance in Chronically Stressed Mice 94%
- Neurocognitive and Functional Heterogeneity in Depressed Youth 93%
- Evidence of decreased gap junction coupling between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the anterior cingulate cortex of depressed suicides 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.