Back

Bioreactor cultures of brain endothelial cells produce extracellular vesicles with comparable characteristics as that of batch cultures

Govindaswamy, B.; Lu, C.-C.; Achanta, N.; Chen, E. Y.; Rebeles, K.; Pinky, P. P.; Basudkar, V.; Parween, F.; Soundara Manickam, D.

2026-10-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.10.05.756840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our prior works have demonstrated the therapeutic potential extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from batch cultures of brain endothelial cells (BECs) owing to their ability to transfer mitochondria to injured recipient cells. However, conventional batch/flask cultures limit scalable and reproducible production of EVs. Here, we evaluated a CELLine AD1000 bioreactor as a platform for sustained production of EVs from mouse b.End3 BECs and compared bioreactor-derived (BR) EVs with EVs obtained conventional batch cultures (BT). Large EVs (lEVs) and small (sEVs) were isolated using a sequential centrifugation protocol and were characterized using dynamic light scattering, nanoparticle tracking analysis, microBCA assay, western blotting, proteomics analysis, and their ability to rescue bioenergetics in oxygen-glucose deprived (OGD) BECs. Bioreactor cultures maintained high cell viabilities (~90%) for up to eight weeks and produced approximately three- to four-fold greater EV protein yields than batch cultures. BR EVs showed reproducible particle characteristics consistent with EV subtypes derived from BT cultures. CD63, CD9 and Arf6 were detected in EV fractions, whereas the mitochondrial outer-membrane protein TOMM20 was enriched in lEVs. Proteomic analyses revealed that bioreactor-derived lEVs retained the mitochondrial cargo signature observed in batch-derived lEVs. Both bioreactor and batch EVs restored relative ATP levels in ODG-exposed BECs. These findings suggest that bioreactor BEC cultures are a scalable approach for generating functionally active BEC-EVs for downstream characterization and therapeutic development.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.