Back

Optimizing Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Parameters on Corticospinal Excitability

Proulx, B.; Hasani, S. A.; Frechette, A.-J.; Hamel, R.; Tremblay, S.; Cote, S.; Lepage, J.-F.

2026-10-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.10.05.756785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol used in clinical settings to alleviate symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Although the pulse parameters currently used in iTBS have remained unchanged since the first treatments, recent controllable TMS devices allow for the personalization of pulse shape and duration, opening the possibility of testing the efficacy of other pulse parameters in modulating corticospinal excitability (CSE). Methods. In a repeated-measures design, changes in CSE were induced by the administration of iTBS over the left primary motor cortex under three different conditions: long bidirectional pulse (L-Bi), long quasi-unidirectional pulse (L-QU), and a control short quasi-unidirectional pulse (S-QU). We assessed TMS-induced motor evoked potentials before and up to 70 minutes after iTBS. We hypothesized that L-QU pulses would induce greater facilitation than other conditions. Results. A mixed linear model showed that all conditions induced increased MEPs compared to baseline. However, the L-Bi pulse led to a larger and more sustained MEP increase than both unidirectional pulses, while the S-QU pulse appeared less effective in modulating CSE. We observed large within- and between-subject variability in responsiveness to the iTBS protocols. Conclusion. These results suggest that L-Bi pulses in iTBS protocols are more potent than unidirectional pulses in inducing CSE changes in the cortex of healthy adults. The individual variability in response to iTBS and the potential clinical relevance of these findings are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.