Back

Benchmarking cartilage regeneration across ten chondrogenic cell sources using native tissue references

Ponta, S.; Pecina, V.; Airoldi, M.; Simmen, D.; Novoa Olivares, E.; Linder, T.; Laurent, A. E.; Applegate, L. A.; Salzmann, G.; Bruhin, V.; Stoddart, M.; Zenobi-Wong, M.; Fisch, P.

2026-10-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.10.05.756631 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A persistent challenge in cartilage tissue engineering is identifying cell sources capable of regenerating cartilage with native-like properties. Variability in chondrogenic potential among human- and animal-derived cells complicates graft development and disease modeling. Here we benchmarked ten chondrogenic cell sources under standardized culture conditions using hyaluronan-alginate biomaterials and implementing a functionality index combining histological and mechanical metrics referenced to native tissue. Mesenchymal stem cells and fetal chondroprogenitors demonstrated superior regenerative capacity, achieving 103% and 95% of native cartilage functionality, respectively. In contrast, adult articular chondrocytes from healthy and osteoarthritic donors produced fibrocartilaginous tissue with functionality scores below 50%. These findings provide a quantitative framework to guide cell source selection and optimize cartilage graft standardization for clinical applications and physiologically relevant disease models, addressing regulatory demands for product characterization.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.