Achieving near single-molecule sensitivity in separation-free protein detection using engineered kinetic proofreading
Xuan, F.; Fan, T. W.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Kim, W.; Jiang, W.; Tan, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Kivisakk, P.; Hammerschlag, B. L.; Lopez, O. L.; Cohen, A. D.; Zeng, X.; Atri, T. E.; Singh, A.; Ashton, N. J.; Arnold, S. E.; Karikari, T. K.; Yin, P.
Show abstract
Unlike nucleic acids, proteins cannot be directly amplified. Ultrasensitive detection must therefore couple efficient analyte-to-signal conversion with strong suppression of target-independent background. Consistently detecting ~100 molecules (below which Poisson sampling noise alone causes CV to exceed 10%) across protein targets in a format as scalable and accessible as PCR remains unsolved. Separation-based ultrasensitive immunoassays require target binding stable enough to survive stringent washing and are therefore constrained by wash-induced signal loss and, more fundamentally, the relative scarcity of exceptionally tight binders. Performance consequently varies across targets; detection limits below 1,000 molecules remain rare. Conventional separation-free proximity assays avoid washing but incur background from random probe collisions, with reported detection limits frequently exceeding 100,000 molecules. Here we introduce Successive Proximity Extension Amplification Reaction (SPEAR), a separation-free architecture in which autonomous engineered DNA nanodevices emulate biological kinetic proofreading. Two successive irreversible proximity-extension steps compound discrimination between analyte-dependent and background reactions, suppressing spurious signals while preserving efficient analyte-to-signal conversion. This design reduces reliance on high-affinity binders and enables sub-fM detection from 1 uL samples through simple 3-step mixing followed by standard qPCR readout. Across 11 biomarkers tested, SPEAR consistently achieved sub-100-molecule detection limits. Where compared, it outperformed ultrasensitive separation-based platforms, analytically and clinically, including for low-abundance Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. SPEAR also precisely quantified SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers from finger-prick dried blood spots, concordant with the cell-based reference assay on venous blood. It detected a distinct mixed phosphorylation state of Tau, and targeting this state resolved previously observed capillary-venous discordance and improved amyloid-status discrimination. These results establish engineered autonomous successive molecular discrimination as a practical strategy for near-single-molecule protein detection, extending the sensitivity, scalability and accessibility of PCR-based testing to non-amplifiable analytes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Photothermal Recycling Biosensing for Continuous, Sensitive Molecular Quantification 97%
- Tunable DNA Origami Nanosensors for Detection of Multiscale Spatial Ion Concentration Gradients 94%
- Aptamer-antibody chimera sensors for sensitive, rapid and reversible molecular detection in complex samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantum Dot Encoding for In-Solution Single-Molecule Biomarker Counting in Metastatic Prostate Cancer 96%
- Chromato-kinetic fingerprinting enables multiomic digital counting of single disease biomarker molecules 93%
- Repurposing Old Antibodies for New Diseases by Exploiting Cross Reactivity and Multicolored Nanoparticles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nanoparticle-Supported, Rapid, Digital Quantification of Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants 95%
- Point-of-Care CRISPR-Cas-Assisted SARS-CoV-2 Detection in an Automated and Mobile Droplet Magnetofluidic Device 94%
- Hitting the diagnostic sweet spot: Point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 salivary antigen testing with an off-the-shelf glucometer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.