TopFor: Automated Preparation of AMBER-Compatible Parameters for Noncanonical Amino Acids in Peptides
Buelbuel, E. F.; Gnanasekar, H.; Benasolo, C.; Rasheed, S.; Mueller, R.; Kalinina, O. V.; Bozhueyuek, K. A. J.
Show abstract
Peptides containing noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) are becoming increasingly important in drug discovery, but their molecular dynamics (MD) simulation remains limited by labor-intensive residue parameterization and topology preparation. Here, we present TopFor (Topology and Residue Force-Field Parameter Preparation), an open-source, peptide-oriented workflow that automates the generation of ncAA residue templates and force-field parameter files for MD simulations with AMBER using established charge-derivation methods. TopFor supports single-residue, whole-peptide, and batch parameterization workflows. The workflow was validated using the MDM2-p53 complex by comparing native AMBER residue definitions with residues processed by TopFor using three charge-derivation methods, each evaluated in three independent 100 ns MD simulations. TopFor-generated residue definitions showed structural and conformational behavior comparable to the native AMBER representation. Applicability to more complex peptide architectures was demonstrated using the head-to-tail cyclic peptide cyclosporin A and the cyclic depsipeptide cyclohexylgriselimycin. At library scale, 1,138 of 1,214 cyclohexylgriselimycin derivatives (93.7%) successfully completed TopFor parameterization and the subsequent initial AMBER-based computational workflow across two derivatization campaigns. TopFor was further integrated into a structure-based peptide discovery workflow based on the DnaN-griselimycin complex. Six GM-derived peptides were computationally prioritized and experimentally evaluated, of which four produced SPR responses against Mycobacterium smegmatis (M. smegmatis) DnaN and three showed concentration-dependent responses. TopFor reduces the manual effort required to prepare ncAA-containing peptides for MD simulations and enables their integration into both library-scale computational screening and structure-based peptide discovery workflows. Keywords: noncanonical amino acids; peptide parameterization; molecular dynamics; AMBER; AmberTools; peptide design; high-throughput virtual screening
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cycledesigner Leveraging RFdiffusion and HighFold to Design Cyclic Peptide Binders for Specific Targets 95%
- Streamlining Computational Fragment-Based Drug Discovery through Evolutionary Optimization Informed by Ligand-Based Virtual Prescreening 95%
- PepSeA: Peptide Sequence Alignment and Visualization Tools to Enable Lead Optimization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- APPTEST is an innovative new method for the automatic prediction of peptide tertiary structures 94%
- Revolutionizing GPCR-Ligand Predictions: DeepGPCR with experimental Validation for High-Precision Drug Discovery 93%
- Structural Interaction Fingerprints and Machine Learning for predicting and explaining binding of small molecule ligands to RNA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepSCM: an efficient convolutional neural network surrogate model for the screening of therapeutic antibody viscosity 94%
- DeepSP: Deep Learning-Based Spatial Properties to Predict Monoclonal Antibody Stability 94%
- Machine learning driven acceleration of biopharmaceutical formulation development using Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.