Mortality gap continuum in severe mental illness: a nationwide study across healthcare and socioeconomic strata
Hjell, G.; Hauge, L. J.; Johansen, R.; Straiton, M.; Zahl, P. H.; Haram, M.; Veloz, M. F. V.; Naess, O. E.; Baravelli, C. M.; Knudsen, A. K. S.; Stene-Larsen, K.; Reneflot, A.; Plana-Ripoll, O.; Kirkoen, B.; Tesli, M.
Show abstract
Background: A comprehensive overview of how premature mortality in severe mental illness varies by socioeconomic position and healthcare utilization is lacking. Methods: We followed all Norwegian residents aged 30-79 years on January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2023. Nationwide registry linkage provided data on mental illness in primary and specialist care, educational attainment, and cause of death. We estimated the mortality gap as excess life-years lost from age 30 for depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia compared with the general population, stratified by sex, healthcare utilization, and educational attainment. All-cause, external-cause, and natural cause mortality were assessed using competing risks. Results: The cohort comprised 2,486,836 individuals, including 483,933 with depression, 40,125 with bipolar disorder, and 21,963 with schizophrenia. Among men, the mortality gap ranged from 1.50 year (95% CI 0.36-3.34) among those with depression, non-inpatient care utilization, and university education to 19.86 years (18.34-21.36) among those with schizophrenia, inpatient care utilization, and less than high school education. Among women, the corresponding range was no gap to 18.16 years (17.03-19.53). Mortality gaps were generally larger with lower educational attainment and inpatient care utilization and increased from depression to bipolar disorder to schizophrenia. This pattern was consistent across sexes, diagnoses, healthcare utilization levels, and educational attainment levels and was most pronounced for natural-cause mortality. Conclusions: Premature mortality among people with severe mental illness forms a continuum across socioeconomic disadvantage, healthcare utilization, and diagnosis. Combining these measures can identify subgroups with the greatest mortality burden and may help target preventive interventions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of diagnosis instability in electronic health records reveals diverse disease trajectories of severe mental illness 95%
- The Associations of Mental Disorders in Children With Parents’ Subsequent Mental Disorders: A Nationwide Cohort Study From Finland and Denmark 93%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and Predictors of General Psychiatric Disorders and Loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Results from the Understanding Society UKHLS 94%
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 94%
- Ethnic differences in receipt of psychological interventions in Early Intervention in Psychosis services in England: a cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life-years lost associated with mental illness: a cohort study of beneficiaries of a South African medical insurance scheme 95%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 94%
- The prevalence of probable mental health disorders among hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of a child’s mental disorder with parental income and employment: Analysis of nationwide register-based cohorts in Finland and Denmark 94%
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Socioeconomic status and severe mental disorders: A Bidirectional Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 94%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Prevalence of mental disorders in people with intellectual disabilities across the lifespan: an umbrella review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.