Back

Refining E-detectioN Tools for Emerging mental disoRders (ENTER) to identify young people at clinical high risk for psychosis in the community: model development and internal validation

Oliver, D.; Fusar-Poli, P.; Brunner, G.; Haining, K.; Estrade, A.; Azis, M.; Bianciardi, B.; Cooper, S.; Ramesh, S.; Wallman, P.; Liang, X.; Logeswaran, Y.; Stefanelli, R.; Damiani, S.; Melillo, A.; Provenzani, U.; McGuire, P.; Brewster, S.; Macdonald, S.; San Vito, P. D. C.; McConnachie, A.; Haig, C.; Spencer, T.; Diederen, K.; Uhlhaas, P. J.

2026-10-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.10.05.26364756 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early detection of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) improves access to preventive care. We developed and internally validated the E-DetectioN Tool for Emerging mental disoRders (ENTER), a multimodal digital screener designed to improve community identification of CHR-P compared with an established approach (PQ-16 cut-off). Participants aged 12-35 years from the UK and Italy completed the online ENTER screener, assessing attenuated psychotic symptoms, processing speed and environmental risk factors. Participants above the PQ-16 cut-off and a random subset below were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS). PQ-16 cut-off and ENTER models were developed using (penalised) logistic regression, random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) within a repeated nested cross-validation framework with semi-supervised learning incorporating unlabelled data. Models were evaluated by discrimination, calibration and clinical utility. 2,522 participants completed the ENTER screener. 495 underwent CAARMS assessments. 124 (25.1%) met CHR-P criteria; 2,027 participants were not assessed with the CAARMS (unlabelled). ENTER showed improved discrimination (C=0.744, 95%CI: 0.697-0.790) compared to the PQ-16 cut-off (C=0.625, 95%CI: 0.570-0.682, p=0.003) and similar calibration (ENTER: slope=1.02, 95%CI: 0.78-1.32; PQ-16 cut-off: slope=0.39, 95%CI: 0.19-0.52, p=0.074). At a clinically relevant threshold, ENTER identified approximately 2 additional CHR-P individuals per 100 assessments compared with the PQ-16 cut-off. Compared with established PQ-16 cut-off pre-screening, ENTER showed higher performance for community identification of CHR-P individuals. Multimodal digital screening might support more informative community triage before specialist assessment. External validation and implementation studies are required to establish real-world clinical utility.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.