Refining E-detectioN Tools for Emerging mental disoRders (ENTER) to identify young people at clinical high risk for psychosis in the community: model development and internal validation
Oliver, D.; Fusar-Poli, P.; Brunner, G.; Haining, K.; Estrade, A.; Azis, M.; Bianciardi, B.; Cooper, S.; Ramesh, S.; Wallman, P.; Liang, X.; Logeswaran, Y.; Stefanelli, R.; Damiani, S.; Melillo, A.; Provenzani, U.; McGuire, P.; Brewster, S.; Macdonald, S.; San Vito, P. D. C.; McConnachie, A.; Haig, C.; Spencer, T.; Diederen, K.; Uhlhaas, P. J.
Show abstract
Early detection of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) improves access to preventive care. We developed and internally validated the E-DetectioN Tool for Emerging mental disoRders (ENTER), a multimodal digital screener designed to improve community identification of CHR-P compared with an established approach (PQ-16 cut-off). Participants aged 12-35 years from the UK and Italy completed the online ENTER screener, assessing attenuated psychotic symptoms, processing speed and environmental risk factors. Participants above the PQ-16 cut-off and a random subset below were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS). PQ-16 cut-off and ENTER models were developed using (penalised) logistic regression, random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) within a repeated nested cross-validation framework with semi-supervised learning incorporating unlabelled data. Models were evaluated by discrimination, calibration and clinical utility. 2,522 participants completed the ENTER screener. 495 underwent CAARMS assessments. 124 (25.1%) met CHR-P criteria; 2,027 participants were not assessed with the CAARMS (unlabelled). ENTER showed improved discrimination (C=0.744, 95%CI: 0.697-0.790) compared to the PQ-16 cut-off (C=0.625, 95%CI: 0.570-0.682, p=0.003) and similar calibration (ENTER: slope=1.02, 95%CI: 0.78-1.32; PQ-16 cut-off: slope=0.39, 95%CI: 0.19-0.52, p=0.074). At a clinically relevant threshold, ENTER identified approximately 2 additional CHR-P individuals per 100 assessments compared with the PQ-16 cut-off. Compared with established PQ-16 cut-off pre-screening, ENTER showed higher performance for community identification of CHR-P individuals. Multimodal digital screening might support more informative community triage before specialist assessment. External validation and implementation studies are required to establish real-world clinical utility.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of diagnosis instability in electronic health records reveals diverse disease trajectories of severe mental illness 94%
- Associations between antipsychotic use, substance use and relapse risks in patients with schizophrenia - real-world evidence from two national cohorts 92%
- Latent subtypes of manic or irritable episode symptoms in two population-based cohorts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Proportion of Patients Who Experience a Prodrome Prior to Psychosis Onset - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
- Cerebral cortical alterations in adolescent early-onset psychosis: a surface-based morphometry mega-analysis 92%
- Longitudinal evolution of the transdiagnostic prodrome to severe mental disorders: a dynamic temporal network analysis informed by natural language processing and electronic health records 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score and 20-Year Course of Illness in Psychotic Disorders 94%
- Prognostic models predicting transition to psychotic disorder using blood-based biomarkers: a systematic review and critical appraisal 93%
- Identifying Psychosis Episodes in Psychiatric Admission Notes via Rule-based Methods, Machine Learning, and Pre-Trained Language Models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can we detect the undetected? Comparing the prodromes of individuals with first episode psychosis detected and undetected by clinical high risk for psychosis services: an electronic health record study 96%
- Motor and Activity Psychosis-Risk (MAP-R) Scale: An exploration of scale structure with replication and validation 94%
- Validation of an ICD-code-based case definition for psychotic illness across three health systems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study 94%
- A Systematic Review on Psychological and Biological Mediators Between Adversity and Psychosis: Potential Targets for Treatment 93%
- The Maudsley Environmental Risk Score for Psychosis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.