Protocol for a feasibility trial of a co-produced intervention: Enabling Service Users with Severe Mental Illness to Learn about and Engage with Good Oral Health (SMILE)
Mishu, M.; Kika, N.; Tkach, E.; Bird, J.; Cupac, J.; Daniel, S.; Horspool, M.; Johnston, G.; Killaspy, H.; Marshman, Z.; Marston, L.; Ndwandwe, S.; Pan, S.; Watson, F.; Peckham, E.
Show abstract
Background: People with severe mental illness (SMI) report poorer oral health outcomes than the general population, are less likely to attend regular dental check-ups, and may require additional support to visit a dentist. Our previous research showed that interventions tailored to their needs and support from the mental health care system are needed to improve oral health outcomes in people with SMI. Although there is some provision of urgent dental care for people with SMI, there are currently limited available interventions that integrate dental and mental health care and provide dental support in a mental healthcare setting. To address this gap, the aims of the SMILE project are to 1) co-develop and 2) test the feasibility and acceptability of an oral health intervention for people with SMI, delivered by mental health professionals in secondary community mental health care settings. This paper describes the protocol for the feasibility and acceptability testing of the SMILE intervention. Methods: This is a single-arm, non-randomised feasibility trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention to support the oral health of mental healthcare service users with SMI. The intervention was co-produced with service users, carers, mental health and dental health professionals, and includes advice on maintaining good oral hygiene and lifestyle habits to maintain good oral health. The main aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the intervention, using quantitative data collected at baseline, three and six-month follow-up, and qualitative interviews with participants and mental health staff involved in delivering the intervention. Results: The study results will determine whether the intervention can be successfully delivered in secondary community mental health care settings and inform the most appropriate primary and secondary outcomes for a future trial. Conclusion: The findings of this study will inform the feasibility of progression to the pilot stage of a randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of delivering an oral health intervention in a mental healthcare setting.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 93%
- Identifying Homeless Population Needs in the Emergency Department Using Community-Based Participatory Research 92%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 92%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 92%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 92%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 91%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 92%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 91%
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.