Identifying Message "Recipes" for High Perceived Effectiveness: Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Profiles of Vaping Public Education Messages Among Young Adults Who Vape
Liu, J.; Peng, Q.; Malik, M.; Wang, Y.; Norton, E.; Ye, T.; Markey, C.; Worsdale, A.; Sweet, L. H.
Show abstract
Introduction: Vaping public education campaigns are a central prevention strategy for young adults (YAs), but message effectiveness varies widely and formative testing typically evaluates one message attribute at a time. This study examined how four perceptual dimensions, including cognitive engagement, social relevance, emotional arousal, and emotional valence, relate to perceived message effectiveness (PME), and whether multiple combinations of these dimensions correspond to similarly high PME. Methods: In a cross-sectional online message-testing study conducted from March to April 2025, 540 U.S. YAs who vape each evaluated 15 messages randomly sampled from a corpus of 229 text-image vaping public education messages, yielding 8,100 message evaluations. Cross-classified multilevel models estimated associations between each perceptual dimension and PME. An Explainable Boosting Machine probed nonlinear associations, and k-means clustering of high-predicted-PME perceptual configurations identified distinct profiles. Analyses were conducted in 2026. Results: Cognitive engagement (b = 0.20, 95% CI [0.18, 0.22]) and social relevance (b = 0.15, 95% CI [0.13, 0.17]) showed the strongest associations with PME, followed by emotional arousal (b = 0.06, 95% CI [0.04, 0.08]); emotional valence showed no linear association (b = 0.00, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.02]). The Explainable Boosting Machine revealed a U-shaped valence pattern, with higher predicted PME at both the negative and positive ends of the scale. Clustering yielded five distinct perceptual profiles with similarly high predicted PME (4.10-4.25). Conclusions: Multiple perceptual configurations correspond to similarly high PME, supporting a configurational approach to formative message testing rather than a single optimal message formula.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions, knowledge, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- The impact of believing you have had COVID-19 on behaviour: Cross-sectional survey 92%
- What triggers online help-seeking retransmission during the COVID-19 period? Empirical evidence from Chinese social media 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reactions to an Online Demonstration of the Effect of Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption on Appearance: Survey 92%
- Public perceptions and preventive behaviours during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study between Hong Kong and the United Kingdom 92%
- COVID-19: Beliefs in misinformation in the Australian community 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parents’ intention to vaccinate their 5-11 years old children with the COVID-19 vaccine: rates, predictors and the role of incentives 90%
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 90%
- Perceived vulnerability to COVID-19 infection from event attendance: Results from Louisiana, USA, two weeks preceding the national emergency declaration 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanisms for the prevention of adolescent intimate partner violence: a realist review of interventions in low- and middle-income countries 91%
- Use of Instagram and its effect on the Mental Well-being of University Students: A Pakistani Perspective 90%
- Health concerns and government distrust: variation in types of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by racial and ethnic group before and at universal vaccine eligibility in the US 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public Preferences for Social Distancing Behaviors to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19: A Discrete Choice Experiment 91%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Reported Incidence, Knowledge, and Behavior 89%
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.