Back

Evidence of active phage replication during vegetable fermentation and implications for the dynamics of bacterial communities

Cantuti Gendre, J.; Renault, M.; Leforestier, A.-C.; Marquet, G.; Irlinger, F.; Fouchard, N.; Landaud, S.; Le Marrec, C.; Chaillou, S.; Dugat-Bony, E.

2026-10-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.10.02.756237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spontaneous vegetable fermentation is driven by the indigenous microbiota associated with the raw ingredients. The process often involves an initial heterofermentative phase followed by a predominantly homofermentative phase, both ensured by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). While microbial dynamics during fermentation are well characterized, phage communities remain poorly understood, despite evidence linking phage activity to LAB succession. We monitored viral and bacterial succession during sauerkraut and carrot fermentations using a metagenomics approach to characterize community dynamics. To further assess the impact of phage PLE001 on bacterial community dynamics, we developed a simplified carrot fermentation model comprising representative strains of Rahnella aquatilis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Two consortia were assembled: one containing the PLE001-susceptible strain L. mesenteroides CIM3004, and the other containing also its phage-resistant derivative, CIM3004 BIM. We observed major shifts in the viral community during the first week of fermentation, coinciding with changes in bacterial structure during hetero- and homofermentative phases transition. In the simplified model, phage PLE001 reduced the population of the host during the heterofermentative phase but did not affect overall fermentation dynamics nor metabolite production. These results suggest that bacteriophages contribute to bacterial succession during fermentation, while communities remain resilient to phage infection, preserving fermentation stability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.