Prediction of in-hospital mortality at a 72-hour intensive care landmark in patients with sepsis and pre-existing hypertension: development and external validation
Chen, Y.; Cai, Y.; Bian, H.; Fu, M.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: In patients with sepsis and pre-existing hypertension, admission findings may not adequately describe the subsequent course of circulatory support and organ dysfunction. We developed and externally validated a model to reassess in-hospital mortality risk after the first 72 hours of intensive care. Methods: This retrospective study used MIMIC-IV for development and eICU-CRD for external validation. Patients had received vasoactive agents and remained in the ICU for at least 72 hours. Static variables were combined with features from six consecutive 12-hour windows. Imputation, feature selection, model fitting, and calibration were performed within training folds during five-fold cross-validation. The final XGBoost model was applied externally without refitting. Evaluation included discrimination, calibration, decision curves, and risk stratification, with an exploratory comparison of static-only and static-plus-dynamic feature sets. Results: The development and external cohorts included 1019 and 1747 patients, with 338 (33.2%) and 516 (29.5%) deaths, respectively. Internal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.752 (95% CI 0.720-0.784). External AUC was 0.713 (95% CI 0.687-0.739), average precision was 0.536, the Brier score was 0.185, and the calibration slope was 0.744. Mortality increased across external risk tertiles from 13.7% to 47.3%. In an exploratory feature-set comparison, the static-plus-dynamic feature set showed a 0.071 higher internal AUC than the static feature set (95% CI 0.042-0.109). Conclusions: Information accumulated during the first 72 hours supported subsequent mortality risk stratification in this selected population. The model retained moderate discrimination externally, supporting further evaluation as an adjunct to clinical reassessment. Local calibration and the clinical consequences of acting on model predictions require evaluation before routine use.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 93%
- Changes in non-linear and time-domain heart rate variability indices between critically ill COVID-19 and all-cause sepsis patients -a retrospective study 92%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- Identifying predictors and determining mortality rates of septic cardiomyopathy and sepsis-related cardiogenic shock: A retrospective, observational study 94%
- Cardiometabolic Indices as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Palliative Care Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Nomogram for In-ICU Deterioration of Stage 1 Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Study 95%
- Three Distinct Trajectories of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Their Significant Association with Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Study with Validation 95%
- Unsupervised clustering reveals phenotypes of AKI in ICU Covid19 patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of a Risk Alert Threshold for ICU Hypoglycemia: Retrospective Analysis of Alert Performance and Association with Clinical Deterioration Events 92%
- COVID-19 as cause of viral sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Immune profiling demonstrates a common immune signature of delayed acquired immunodeficiency in patients with various etiologies of severe injury 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 95%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 94%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.