Back

Effects of CO2 on the growth and metabolism of Akkermansia muciniphila

Sakurai, M.; Ogiwara, S.; Osawa, R.; Junyang, Y.; Satoh, T.

2026-10-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756130 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human gut is home to more than 100 trillion bacteria, where various environmental factors, such as nutrients and gases, exist and influence them. The levels of fermentation gases in the gut, including CO2, fluctuate depending on the host's diet. However, how CO2, an environmental factor, affects the physiological states of gut anaerobes remains poorly understood, but CO2 is often utilized in their cultivation. Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila) is widely studied as a beneficial human gut microbe. However, the effects of CO2 on the physiological state of A. muciniphila are not fully understood. In this study, we focused on CO2 as an environmental factor and aimed to clarify how CO2 affects the physiological state of A. muciniphila. Culture experiments showed that compared with the absence of CO2, the presence of CO2 significantly increased the growth of A. muciniphila. The results of the metabolomic analysis revealed distinct metabolic profiles in the presence or absence of CO2. The tracing analysis using stable 13C-labelled CO2 demonstrated that CO2 was incorporated into various metabolites in the TCA cycle, the de novo purine/pyrimidine synthesis pathways, and other pathways. In addition, the activity of pyruvate carboxylase, which catalyses an anaplerotic reaction involving CO2 fixation to supply oxaloacetate (OAA) to the TCA cycle, was significantly higher in A. muciniphila cells grown in the presence of CO2. Moreover, supplementation with OAA increased the growth of A. muciniphila in a dose-dependent manner, mirroring the effects of CO2 supplementation. These findings suggest that A. muciniphila utilizes CO2 for an anaplerotic reaction in the TCA cycle and other pathways involving CO2 incorporation, facilitating metabolic flux to promote its robust growth.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.