Back

Designing enzymes for new-to-nature chemistry and non-natural substrates with AlphaProtein Novo

Wu, Z.; Abramson, J.; Frerix, T.; Chu, A. E.; Zhang, R. K.; Schulz, L.; Danson, A. E.; Kwan, T. O. C.; Li, W. K.; Kelly, J.; Li, Z.-Q.; Schneider, R. G.; Thillaisundaram, A.; Patani, H.; Zambaldi, V. F.; Singh, S.; La, D.; Domecillo, M.; Mora, A. N.; Reisenbauer, J. C.; Zhang, Y.; Papa, E.; Zemgulyte, A.; Wu, Y.-H.; Zidek, A.; Shi, J.; Margand, G.; Assem, N.; Stephen, K.; Emrich, C.; Liu, P.; Lucy, C.; Hassabis, D.; Fergus, R.; Arnold, F. H.; Kohli, P.; Wang, J.

2026-10-05 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.10.01.756017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Creating highly active enzymes for arbitrary reactions is a transformative goal for the molecular sciences (1). Traditional protein engineering (2,3) is constrained by a reliance on existing natural starting points, which are often challenging to discover. De novo design offers the potential to overcome this by creating enzymes from first principles (4), but has yet to achieve practically relevant catalytic properties. Here we present AlphaProtein Novo (AP Novo), a machine-learning pipeline that demonstrates, for the first time, that de novo enzyme design can outperform natural sequence mining in addressing challenging chemistry. We used AP Novo to design new-to-nature nitrene transferases to synthesise the pharmacophore piperidine with unprecedented product selectivity, and to create enzymes that degrade the environmental toxin DEHP under conditions that denature natural enzymes. We also obtained state-of-the-art catalytic efficiencies on two well-studied model reactions, and through iterative design and analysis found that key enablers of success were mechanism-inspired metrics based on AlphaFold 3 predictions and sequence-ensemble-based scoring of designed backbones. Our results show that de novo design has become a powerful complement to natural enzyme diversity for discovering catalysts for a range of applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.