Mechanical fidelity of brain tissue phantoms: A comparative experimental characterization of equilibrium and dissipative behavior
Baldoin, E.; Kainz, M. P.; Petrone, N.; Pavan, P. G.; Holzapfel, G. A.; Terzano, M.
Show abstract
Despite lacking a dedicated structural function, brain tissue is exposed to severe mechanical loading during accidents and trauma, with potentially permanent or lethal consequences. Therefore, characterizing its mechanical behavior assumes particular importance for designing protective equipment, planning surgeries, and training neurosurgeons, tasks that often rely on physical brain replicas made from phantom materials. Although the mechanics of brain tissue has been extensively studied, the selection of suitable phantom materials still relies on simplified metrics that fail to capture the highly nonlinear and rate-dependent behavior of the brain. In this work, we characterize the mechanical response at low-to-medium strain rates of common synthetic brain phantom materials, including Sylgard 527, Ecoflex Gel, and a composite hydrogel, and establish rigorous comparisons with porcine brain tissue as a benchmark. To this end, we employ a multi-step stress relaxation protocol under both uniaxial extension and compression across two different strain rates, introduce thermodynamic metrics, and perform comparisons based on rigorous statistical analysis. In particular, we isolate the thermodynamic equilibrium stress-strain curves, representing the baseline material's response, from rate-dependent dissipative inelastic effects, relatable to viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanisms. Our results provide a thorough comparison, revealing critical limitations in existing simulant materials and highlighting significant space for developing improved brain surrogates. The comprehensive dataset collected can also support the calibration of constitutive models, enhancing the predictive accuracy of numerical simulations involving brain tissue and its surrogates. More broadly, this study highlights the need to move beyond simplistic, scalar-metric-based comparisons of mechanical responses across materials.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifiability of Tissue Material Parameters from Uniaxial Tests using Multi-start Optimization 94%
- Porosity-permeability tensor relationship of closely and randomly packed fibrous biomaterials and biological tissues: Application to the brain white matter 94%
- Equilibrium Tension and Compression Mechanical Properties of the Human Uterus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Inference Framework to Identify Skin Material Properties \textit{in vivo} from Active Membranes 93%
- Stretching the Limits: From Planar-Biaxial Stress-Stretch to Arterial Pressure-Diameter 92%
- Comparison of two different finite element modeling pipelines for virtual mechanical testing of the distal third metacarpal bone in Thoroughbred racehorses 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Urological benchtop and in silico models validated by human penile tissue inflation tests 93%
- Critical Pressure of Intramural Delamination in Aortic Dissection 91%
- Peaks and Distributions of White Matter Tract-related Strains in Bicycle Helmeted Impacts: Implication for Helmet Ranking and Optimization 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.