Back

Rapid Molecular Assessment of Kidney Allograft Rejection Using the Biopsy Transport Medium

Li, Z.; Kalverboer, N.; van der Helm, D.; Callegaro, G.; van de Water, B.; Meziyerh, S.; Vries, A. P. J. d.; Baelde, H. J.; Kers, J.

2026-10-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.10.01.26364480 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Timely diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection is critical for post-transplant management, yet treatment decisions may need to be made empirically while awaiting the final pathology report. We previously demonstrated that biopsy transport medium (BTM) contains molecular signals reflective of allograft rejection. Building on these findings, we developed a rapid BTM qPCR workflow using a targeted gene panel for early molecular assessment of rejection. Methods Kidney transplant biopsies assessed at Leiden University Medical Center from April 2023 to November 2024 were eligible. A predefined gene panel was quantified in BTM by qPCR, while matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were profiled using Tempo-Seq. Elastic Net, Random Forest, and support vector machine models were developed to classify rejection and predict continuous histological indices directly from the BTM. Results A total of 134 paired BTM samples and biopsy tissues were analyzed. The best-performing BTM gene-panel models demonstrated good discrimination for rejection, with a median AUC of 0.80, and good calibration (median slope, 0.92; median intercept, 0.08). For continuous histological indices, the best-performing BTM gene-panel models achieved R square values of 0.33 for Activity, 0.31 for TCMR/TI, and 0.27 for AMR/MVI. Corresponding biopsy gene-panel models showed similar patterns across diagnostic outcomes. Conclusions The BTM qPCR workflow captures molecular features of kidney allograft rejection and enables prediction of rejection status along the spectrum of continuous activity indices. By providing same-day molecular information while definitive biopsy interpretation is pending, this rapid approach has the potential to complement conventional histopathological diagnostics and support early clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.