Patients' Experiences in a Dialogue-Based Outpatient Clinic Embedded Within Routine Oncology Care
Yoshimura, K.; Fujioka, S.; Lewis, P. M.; Hirata, M.; Tani, M.; Akazawa, K.; Kohno, N.
Show abstract
Objectives Contemporary oncology has achieved remarkable advances in biomedical treatment while increasingly emphasizing patient-centered care. Nevertheless, routine oncology consultations must address multiple competing clinical priorities, potentially limiting opportunities for patients' experiences to become visible. To address this gap, we established a Dialogue-Based Outpatient Clinic, a complementary patient-directed consultation model embedded within routine oncology care. This study explored the dimensions of patients' experiences that became visible through this consultation model. Methods We conducted a qualitative study of 44 consecutive patients who attended a Dialogue-Based Outpatient Clinic embedded within routine oncology care between 2021 and 2023. Patients attended the clinic either on their own initiative or following a recommendation from a healthcare professional who recognized that they were struggling. Regardless of how they came to the clinic, patients independently determined the consultation agenda. Results Of the 44 patients, 13 (29.5%) sought biomedical information regarding diagnosis, treatment, or adverse effects, whereas 31 (70.5%) discussed concerns extending beyond biomedical issues. Reflexive thematic analysis of these 31 patients identified four interconnected themes: (1) making sense of a cancer diagnosis within one's own life; (2) negotiating treatment in relation to personal values and life priorities; (3) being treated for disease but not seen as a person; and (4) reconstructing life and identity through the cancer journey. Across all themes, patient-directed dialogue consistently revealed how patients understood cancer within the broader context of their lives rather than as an isolated biomedical condition. Conclusions Patient-directed dialogue within routine oncology care revealed dimensions of patients' experiences that may be less readily recognized in conventional consultations. A complementary consultation model that allows patients to determine the agenda may provide opportunities for these experiences to become clinically recognizable.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 92%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 89%
- Meta-Analysis of Adenoviral p53 Gene Therapy Clinical Trials in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 94%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 91%
- Making prognostic algorithms useful in shared decision-making: Patients and clinicians’ requirements for the Predict:Breast Cancer interface 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 96%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 89%
- Decoding the JAK-STAT axis in colorectal cancer with AI-HOPE-JAK-STAT: A conversational artificial intelligence approach to clinical-genomic integration 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.