Position-wise Fold-Switch Prediction in Metamorphic Proteins: A Comparison of Handcrafted and Language Model Features
Machingal, P.; Hemachandra, N.; Balaji, P. V.
Show abstract
In this work, we focus on predicting fold-switching phenomena observed in certain protein structures. Proteins that undergo fold-switching are called metamorphic proteins. We model fold-switch prediction in proteins as a position/residue-wise classification task. We use various features extracted from a protein's sequence as well as structure to train the classifiers. We propose a novel class of handcrafted parametrised features that encode the structural context of a residue. We also use embeddings from existing protein language models (PLMs) to train the classifiers. We train binary and 3-class classifiers, with the 3-class classifiers providing granular information on the type of fold-switch. In our computations, higher classification performance is achieved for binary prediction as compared to 3-class granular prediction. The handcrafted features perform comparably with the PLM embeddings on our standard test set. A rigorous error analysis by us during the review period revealed a critical data-leakage vulnerability in the metamorphic protein test data. This analysis also revealed that the PLM-based classifier suffers sequence-memorisation bias and fails to generalise to novel fold-switching sequences. On the other hand, one of our domain-informed handcrafted feature based classifier detects fold-switching without relying on sequence memory.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MULAN: Multimodal Protein Language Model for Sequence and Structure Encoding 96%
- Estimating Protein Complex Model Accuracy Using Graph Transformers and Pairwise Similarity Graphs 95%
- SAINT-Angle: self-attention augmented inception-inside-inception network and transfer learning improve protein backbone torsion angle prediction 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.