Back

Gene transcriptional profiling to assess Chinook salmon osmoregulatory resilience to salinity challenges

Islam, S. S.; Jeffries, K. M.; Heath, J. W.; Heath, D. D.

2026-10-06 genomics
10.64898/2026.09.30.755653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Given unprecedented environmental change, Pacific salmonids are becoming increasingly threatened; however, genomic technologies provide an opportunity to assess Pacific salmonid resilience to on-going environmental change. Also, given increasing conservation and animal welfare concerns, non-lethal tissue sampling is emerging for assessing the physiological status of wild species. Relatively few studies, however, have compared the transcriptomic response of fish sampled non-lethally versus lethally for fish health and stress quantification. Here, we conducted a comparative gene transcriptional profiling study using 28 qPCR assays on the OpenArray platform as an osmoregulatory stress transcriptional profiling chip. We sampled both non-lethal (gill biopsies, skin swabs, and water [eRNA]) and lethal (whole gill and liver) tissue samples from Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts exposed for 0 h, 24 h, and 72 h to freshwater (0 PSU), brackish water (15 PSU) or seawater (30 PSU). We observed that most assays showed higher qPCR amplification success in both non-lethal gill biopsies and lethal gill tissues, compared to other tissues. We found more significant differences in transcript abundance in traditional lethal tissues compared to non-lethal tissues. With increasing duration of salinity exposure, gene transcript levels were typically upregulated in seawater samples compared to freshwater samples for both non-lethal and lethal tissues. The targeted genes for both non-lethal and lethal tissues were significantly and positively correlated across time points. Our findings support the use of non-lethal tissue sampling to improve Chinook salmon hatchery rearing, inform hatchery release timing, and facilitate future field application for the conservation of wild stocks.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.