Back

Psychometric properties of the Alimetry Gut-Brain Wellbeing Survey-II: A revised, unidirectional mental health scale for patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms

Law, M.; Pickering, I.; Schamberg, G.; Daker, C.; Gharibans, A. A.; O'Grady, G.; Andrews, C. N.; Calder, S.

2026-10-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.30.26364444 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: The Alimetry Gut-Brain Wellbeing (AGBW) Survey is a validated 10-item scale developed to assess mental health in patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. While the original scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties overall, as part of an ongoing commitment to continuous instrument optimization, this study evaluated a revised, unidirectional version of the scale (AGBW-II) to enhance measurement precision. Methods: The psychometric properties of the revised AGBW-II were evaluated via an anonymous online questionnaire in a sample of 161 patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. Score distributions, factor analysis, reliability, and validity were analyzed and compared with data from the validation study of the original scale (n= 311). Results: The AGBW-II total and subscale scores demonstrated robust reliability and validity, outperforming the original AGBW Survey. Notable improvements in the reliability and validity of the stress subscale were observed following item rewording. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor model separating the depression, stress, and anxiety subscales, with the AGBW-II showing improved model fit indices. Conclusions: The revised, unidirectional AGBW-II demonstrated improved reliability and validity, while maintaining the underlying psychometric properties of the original scale. Consequently, the AGBW-II provides a reliable, valid, and brief mental health assessment for patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.