Beyond Walking Speed: Estimating and Classifying Post-Stroke Gait Propulsion From Standardized Clinical Measures
Fei, J.; Wang, R.; Awad, L.
Show abstract
Background: Gait propulsion (anterior ground reaction force) is commonly impaired after stroke. Force plates and wearable sensors can quantify propulsion but are not routinely available in clinical settings. Walking speed alone does not adequately capture the heterogeneity of propulsion deficits. Objective: To determine whether standardized clinical measures can estimate post-stroke propulsion metrics and classify propulsion impairment. Methods: Forty individuals post-stroke participated: 33 for model development and cross-validation (11 with repeated observations for longitudinal validation) and 7 for independent-cohort validation. Clinical measures included the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), comfortable walking speed (CWS), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and stroke chronicity. Regression models were developed to estimate three propulsion metrics: paretic propulsion peak and impulse, and interlimb propulsion symmetry. Model performance was evaluated using R2 and RMSE. Propulsion impairment was classified from symmetry estimates using a prespecified cutoff of 31.5%, with classification accuracy reported. Results: Models using the 6MWT, SPPB, TUG, and chronicity estimated paretic propulsion peak (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 3.00 %body weight) and impulse (R2 = 0.81, RMSE = 0.65 %body weight {middle dot} %stance phase). FMA-LE, SPPB, TUG, and chronicity estimated propulsion symmetry (R2 = 0.75, RMSE = 8.56%) and classified propulsion impairment with 84.8% accuracy. Classification accuracy was 91.7% in longitudinal validation and 85.7% in independent-cohort validation. Conclusions: A multidomain clinical assessment framework may support practical and accurate estimation and classification of post-stroke propulsion impairment in clinical settings where specialized instrumentation is unavailable.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-site identification and generalization of clusters of walking impairment in individuals with chronic stroke and neurotypical controls 96%
- Beyond the Wrist: Finger-Worn Accelerometers Enhance Assessment of Post-Stroke Motor Performance 96%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between gait asymmetry and stability in people with sub-acute stroke 97%
- Differences in centre of mass measurements between markerless and marker-based motion capture systems during balance and mobility assessments in individuals with chronic and sub-acute stroke 96%
- Concurrent validity and discriminative ability of force plate measures of balance during the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 95%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 95%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between the rate of perceived stability, electrodermal activity and task performance during balance challenges in chronic stroke 96%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 95%
- Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomized control trial 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.