Back

Escaping the Negative Attentional Bias in Depression with Real-Time Neurofeedback

Lubianiker, N.; Woods, B.; Nitchie, F.; Batzdorf, A.; Mennen, A.; Lin, Q.; Norman, K. A.; Turk-Browne, N. B.; Sheline, Y. I.

2026-10-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.30.26363896 medRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) show an attentional bias toward negatively valenced stimuli and thoughts. In this study, we applied a closed-loop neurofeedback procedure designed to reduce this bias. Participants were shown composite negative faces and neutral scenes with variable opacity and were instructed to attend to the neutral scene while ignoring the negative face. Internal attentional states were decoded in real time from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. When a participant's decoded attentional state indicated a failure to ignore the negative faces, the faces became more visible (higher opacity), thus externalizing the brain's attentional lapse in that moment. Forty-eight individuals with MDD were randomly assigned to a real neurofeedback training group (N = 24) or a sham control group (N = 24); the control group received feedback yoked to a participant in the real group. All participants completed three fMRI neurofeedback sessions. The main outcome quantified the extent to which participants got ``stuck'' in the most negative attentional state of focusing strongly on the negative faces. We hypothesized that the real neurofeedback group would learn to escape that state by the end of training, relative to the sham control group. Consistent with our hypothesis, neurofeedback training reduced the probability of getting stuck in the most negative attentional state. In offline analyses, training reduced fMRI activity in the precuneus/posterior cingulate and the medial prefrontal cortex when participants successfully attended to scenes and ignored faces. These results demonstrate the efficacy of remediating the negative attentional bias in depression with closed-loop neurofeedback from real-time fMRI.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.