Escaping the Negative Attentional Bias in Depression with Real-Time Neurofeedback
Lubianiker, N.; Woods, B.; Nitchie, F.; Batzdorf, A.; Mennen, A.; Lin, Q.; Norman, K. A.; Turk-Browne, N. B.; Sheline, Y. I.
Show abstract
Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) show an attentional bias toward negatively valenced stimuli and thoughts. In this study, we applied a closed-loop neurofeedback procedure designed to reduce this bias. Participants were shown composite negative faces and neutral scenes with variable opacity and were instructed to attend to the neutral scene while ignoring the negative face. Internal attentional states were decoded in real time from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. When a participant's decoded attentional state indicated a failure to ignore the negative faces, the faces became more visible (higher opacity), thus externalizing the brain's attentional lapse in that moment. Forty-eight individuals with MDD were randomly assigned to a real neurofeedback training group (N = 24) or a sham control group (N = 24); the control group received feedback yoked to a participant in the real group. All participants completed three fMRI neurofeedback sessions. The main outcome quantified the extent to which participants got ``stuck'' in the most negative attentional state of focusing strongly on the negative faces. We hypothesized that the real neurofeedback group would learn to escape that state by the end of training, relative to the sham control group. Consistent with our hypothesis, neurofeedback training reduced the probability of getting stuck in the most negative attentional state. In offline analyses, training reduced fMRI activity in the precuneus/posterior cingulate and the medial prefrontal cortex when participants successfully attended to scenes and ignored faces. These results demonstrate the efficacy of remediating the negative attentional bias in depression with closed-loop neurofeedback from real-time fMRI.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 96%
- Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms 96%
- Increased Insular Functional Connectivity During Repetitive Negative Thinking in Major Depression and Healthy Volunteers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased resting-state functional connectivity within theta and alpha frequency bands in dysphoria: Towards a novel measure of depression risk 95%
- Impaired Social Learning Predicts Reduced Real-life Motivation in Individuals with Depression: A Computational fMRI Study 94%
- What is the relation between major depressive disorder and amygdala reactivity? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction in left frontal alpha oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation in major depressive disorder is context-dependent in a randomized-clinical trial 93%
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 92%
- MRI-Derived Markers of Acute and Chronic Inflammatory Processes in the VTA Associated with Depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Self-Focused Brain Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Response in a Transdiagnostic Sample 93%
- Transient frontal spectral events from EEG predict antidepressant response to sertraline in depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Targeting the Default Mode Network for the Treatment of Depression 93%
- Ketamine and attentional bias to threat: dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic connectivity in treatment-resistant depression 92%
- Reduced loss aversion in subclinical negative symptoms and hypomania 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.