Back

Night-break photoperiod timing shapes growth trajectories, functional phenotype, and biomass partitioning in Cannabis sativa L. in a genotype-dependent manner

Rodriguez-Roncancio, M. P.; Castillo-Hernandez, L. C.; Love, N.; Melgarejo, L. M.; Sarmiento, F.

2026-09-30 plant biology
10.64898/2026.09.29.755452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cannabis sativa L. cultivation in tropical regions or under indoor conditions requires supplemental lighting to maintain plant yields. Night-break (NB) photoperiods offer a cost-effective alternative to conventional day extension, although genotypic responses have not been clearly described. This study evaluated the effects of continuous and pulsed NB treatments on the growth, phenology, physiology, productivity, and cannabinoid accumulation of three Cannabis sativa genotypes representing two chemotypes. Plants were exposed to a commercial 18-h photoperiod (T1), a continuous 1-h NB (T2), or four 15-min NB pulses (T3) with equal total duration. Continuous NB produced responses comparable to the commercial photoperiod. In contrast, pulsed NB accelerated phenological progression by two to three weeks and reduced final plant height by 15-28%, depending on genotype, without impairing photosynthetic performance or decreasing floral dry biomass. Harvest index increased under both NB treatments, indicating enhanced biomass allocation to reproductive structures, while cannabinoid accumulation remained primarily genotype-dependent with only minor treatment-specific modulation. These findings demonstrate that NB efficacy depends not only on the duration of nocturnal light but also on its temporal distribution, highlighting temporal organization of nocturnal light as a key regulator of photoperiodic responses and a promising strategy for optimizing cannabis cultivation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.