Back

SysNDD: A Systematic Database for Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Popp, B.; Frueh, S.; Altay, M. F.; Van Esch, H.; Caliebe, A.; Bramswig, N. C.; Hummel, F.; Gverdtsiteli, S.; Kleefstra, T.; Schenck, A.; Tuemer, Z.; Verloes, A.; Zweier, C.

2026-10-01 genetics
10.64898/2026.09.29.755401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, and evidence linking additional genes to disease evolves rapidly. We developed SysNDD, an open-access, expert-curated resource that represents distinct gene-inheritance-disease associations as entities with standardized confidence, phenotype, and variant annotations. Each entity retains its curation history, so its evidence category can change as evidence accumulates. Currently, SysNDD contains 4,275 entities curated from 4,932 publications. Of these, 3,758 entities involving 3,271 genes describe NDDs; the remainder record non-NDD disorders, nearly all linked to NDD-associated genes, included for completeness. Regarding NDD evidence categories, 1,838 genes are Definitive, 179 Moderate, 1,248 Limited, and 6 Refuted. The entity model captures inheritance-specific disorders, including 220 genes with both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive NDD associations. Comparison with seven other NDD gene resources showed complementary coverage, and evidence categories largely agreed with those of ClinGen, Gene2Phenotype, and PanelApp for shared gene-disease pairs. NDD genes formed distinct molecular modules, whereas associated disorders formed broad, overlapping phenotype groups that corresponded to those modules only selectively. SysNDD provides a continuously maintained, programmatically accessible framework for gene-disease evidence assessment, inheritance-aware interpretation, and systematic NDD research.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.