Back

Evaluation of Human Norovirus Replication in Salivary Gland Cells

Harlow, J.; Briggs, S.; Pothier, E.; Pham, K.; Nasheri, N.

2026-10-01 microbiology
10.64898/2026.09.29.755260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human noroviruses (HuNoVs) are the most common cause of non-bacterial foodborne illnesses worldwide. HuNoVs are notoriously difficult to culture, and current cell culture systems, such as human intestinal enteroids have limitations in efficiency and scalability, which has limited their applications in food safety studies. Recently, it has been shown that transformed salivary gland cell lines (including NS-SV-TT-DC) allow for replication and passaging of norovirus GII.4. Herein, we examined whether we can independently observe viral replication in salivary gland cells and if other strains of human norovirus can replicate in these cells. For this purpose, we first evaluated the replication of several norovirus strains in NS-SV-TT-DC cells by either infecting them with vesicle-cloaked viruses or total viruses in stool filtrates. Low levels of viral replication was observed and vesicle isolation did not improve viral replication. Next, we screened for replication of 50 norovirus samples from 9 genotypes, and 14 isolates demonstrated over a two-fold viral replication. We observed that the initial viral load in the samples does not have a significant effect on replication efficiency. We were also able to passage several isolates. Subsequently, we examined whether interferon inhibitors such as Ruxolitinib, TPCA-1, and BX795 would improve viral replication and observed negligible effects. Finally we tested multiple supplements including MgCl2, bile salt, ceramide, and TAK-779. Most supplements had little or no effect on HuNoV replication in NS-SV-TT-DC cells. Bile salt and TAK-779 showed limited, genotype-specific benefits. Altogether these results indicate that salivary gland cells allow limited replication of certain HuNoV isolates.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.