An explainable multimodal framework for exploring depression-associated speech representations in Alzheimer's disease
Hassan, H.; Patel, D.; Aagela, H.; Johnson, A.
Show abstract
Depression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is clinically challenging to characterise because affective and cognitive manifestations frequently overlap with the underlying neurodegenerative condition. This study investigates depression-related speech patterns in AD using an explainable multimodal framework that integrates linguistic and acoustic features from elicited picture-description speech. To address the absence of directly observed depression labels in the target AD cohort, we employ a source-informed cross-dataset transfer strategy. Unsupervised clustering identified two distinct speech sub-phenotypes within the AD cohort. By comparing these unsupervised representations to a depression-labelled source corpus, one cluster demonstrated mathematical proximity (measured via cosine similarity in a shared latent space) to the source depression centroid. We explicitly acknowledge that this proximity reflects geometric similarity in a shared latent space, which may encapsulate overlapping domain characteristics alongside affective variance. To validate the structural integrity and separability of these discovered clusters, a proxy supervised classification task was employed. The retained multimodal artificial neural network (ANN) integrated information from both modalities and achieved 92.73\% cluster separability accuracy. This demonstrates that the representation-derived two-cluster partition was highly learnable on the independent internal hold-out test set; it does not establish clinical validity, longitudinal stability, or diagnostic validity of the identified sub-phenotypes. For interpretability, Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was utilised to extract feature attributions and organise influential acoustic and linguistic features into a multimodal taxonomy. Furthermore, a Multimodal SHAP Attribution Magnitude (MSAM) score was derived as an exploratory model-based attribution score rather than a clinically validated severity measure. Ultimately, this study provides an interpretable computational baseline for characterising depression-related speech variance in AD, establishing a structural foundation for future prospective validation using independently labelled clinical cohorts.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sound-evoked auditory neurophysiological signals are a window into prodromal functional differences in a preclinical model of Alzheimer's Disease 92%
- An Unsupervised XAI Framework for Dementia Detection with Context Enrichment 92%
- Predicting cognitive decline in a low-dimensional representation of brain morphology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty in Deep Learning for EEG under Dataset Shifts 89%
- AI-based mining of biomedical literature: Applications for drug repurposing for the treatment of dementia 89%
- Subtle anomaly detection in MRI brain scans: Application to biomarkers extraction in patients with de novo Parkinson’s disease 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- CharMark: A Markov Approach to Linguistic Biomarkers in Dementia 95%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 88%
- Remote digital measurement of visual and auditory markers of Major Depressive Disorder severity and treatment response. 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable multivariate survival models: Improving predictions for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimers disease (AD) via data fusion and machine learning 94%
- c-Triadem: A constrained, explainable deep learning model to identify novel biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease 93%
- Examining heterogeneity in dementia using data-driven unsupervised clustering of cognitive profiles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.