Back

Sample Size and Power Calculations Based on Endpoint Responsiveness: Applications to Trials of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Parkinson's Disease

Pedrera Gomez, M.; Bernasconi, C.; Mazza, C.; Belachew, S.

2026-10-05 neurology
10.64898/2026.09.29.26363876 medRxiv
Show abstract

In Parkinson's disease (PD), early phase clinical trials of disease-modifying agents generally use the MDS-UPDRS Part III as the primary outcome measure of motor function, which typically requires a large sample and/or a long (12-18 months) treatment duration, even if a substantial treatment effect is assumed. This is due to the rather slow rate of early PD progression relative to the variability of the MDS-UPDRS Part III assessments. Using placebo-arm data from four recent large Phase 2 trials of early-stage PD (SPARK, PASADENA, PADOVA and LUMA), the sample size needed to detect a range of assumed treatment effects on MDS-UPDRS Part III progression was estimated. The trial sample size estimates obtained for MDS-UPDRS Part III and for smartphone-based sensor-derived motor functional composite (MFC) endpoints were compared using an approach based on relative responsiveness to disease progression. The calculations were also implemented in an interactive, publicly accessible application. Powering a one-year trial using the MFC1 endpoint, derived from three active assessments (6-minute walk, U-turn and Hand Pronation-Supination), or the MFC2, which adds 60-Second Typing, was projected to reduce the required sample size by more than half relative to the MDS-UPDRS Part III, assuming equivalent proportional treatment effects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.