Back

Anti-defense systems of viral communitie vary with genomic traits, host immunity and environmental stress

Huang, D.; Yang, Y.; Wu, R.; Balcazar, J. L.; Alvarez, P. J. J.; Zhou, J.; Yu, P.

2026-09-29 microbiology
10.64898/2026.09.28.755093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract: Background Despite the ecological importance of viral anti-defense systems (ADS), yet how viral ADS repertoires vary across microbial ecosystems remains poorly understood. Here, we integrated global virus datasets with metagenomes from heavy metal-contaminated soils and chromium-stress microcosms to investigate ecological determinants of viral ADS. Results We found that ADS repertoires were constrained by viral genome capacity, with most ADS-carrying viruses encoded a single system, whereas multi-ADS occurred mainly in larger genomes. Viral lifestyle partitioned ADS, with temperate viruses enriched in ADS targeting early-stage defenses and virulent viruses preferentially encoding ADS against mid- and late-stage defense. ADS composition also varied by host lineage and across habitats, linking viral ADS repertoires to host immune landscapes and ecosystem-specific viral strategies. Moreover, along the heavy metal contamination gradient, changes in the prevalence of ADS-carrying viruses occurred alongside shifts in prokaryotic defense profiles. In addition, expanded ADS repertoires may further increase dissemination potential of MGE-borne adaptive genes, highlighting viral ADS as a potential contributor to the adaptive evolution of microbial community. Conclusions These findings reveal that viral ADS are shaped by genomic traits, host immunity and environmental stress, with implications for virus-host interaction and microbial adaptive evolution. More broadly, this study extends anti-defense research beyond individual virus-host systems, offering an integrative, community-level perspective to guide future studies testing whether and how virus-prokaryote immune interactions contribute to microbial community dynamics and evolution in changing environments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.