Drainage water management reduces nutrient, Escherichia coli, and antibiotic resistance gene export
Thrift-Cahall, E. M.; Tank, J. L.; Mahl, U. H.; Liddick, M. J.; Badilla-Aguilar, A.; Bibby, K.
Show abstract
Subsurface tile drainage rapidly transports nutrients and biological contaminants to surface waters, yet multi-year evaluations of drainage water management (DWM) effects on nutrients, Escherichia coli, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) remain limited. A paired-field design with high-frequency soil moisture monitoring was used to quantify water yield, dissolved nitrogen, phosphorus, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) over seven and eight water years, and ARGs (tetM, tetW, ermB, sul1) over two years in southern Michigan. Soil moisture at tile depth (~75 cm) was higher under controlled drainage, confirming that DWM increases field water-holding capacity. Compared to the free drainage field, DWM reduced cumulative tile discharge by 43% and annual nutrient yields by 46-83% for nitrate and 12-82% for soluble reactive phosphorus, but effects on ammonium were variable. Average daily nutrient yields declined by ~50% over the study period, driven primarily by managed periods. Nutrient concentrations did not differ between treatments, indicating that yield reductions resulted from decreased water loss. Mean daily E. coli yields declined by 71% over the study period, and concentrations were 46% lower under controlled drainage. Controlled drainage reduced tetM and sul1 ARG concentrations and yields during managed periods and throughout the study; however, sensitivity analyses showed that these effects were strongly influenced by a high-precipitation event. After excluding the event, differences in ARG concentrations were no longer detected, although ARG yields remained 43% lower during managed periods. These findings highlight the potential for DWM to mitigate nutrient, microbial, and antibiotic resistance transport from agricultural drainage systems.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple stressors in multiple species: effects of different RDX soil concentrations and differential water-resourcing on RDX fate, plant health, and plant survival 94%
- Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: a meta-analysis 93%
- Composition Wheels: Visualizing dissolved organic matter using common composition metrics across a variety of Canadian Ecozones 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Integration of Microbial Source Tracking in a River Watershed Monitoring Plan 94%
- Comprehensive Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Spread Using Wastewater-based Epidemiology Studies 93%
- COVID-19 wastewater surveillance in rural communities: Comparison of lagoon and pumping station samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ripples of Resistance: Unveiling Antimicrobial Resistance Dynamics Along Switzerland's Aare River 95%
- A Statistical Review of Virus Reduction in Coagulation, Flocculation, and Sedimentation Treatment Processes 94%
- When Case Reporting Becomes Untenable: Can Sewer Networks Tell Us Where COVID-19 Transmission Occurs? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Watershed Characteristics for Improving Fecal Source Identification 95%
- Water storage and irrigation practices associated with cannabis production drive seasonal patterns of water extraction and use in Northern California watersheds 95%
- Frass fertilizers from mass-reared insects: species variation, heat treatment effects, and implications for soil application 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulating drying and human impacts on river networks to evaluate biological quality indices performance through the lens of metacommunity theory 90%
- Evaluating the ecological impacts of pesticide seed treatments on arthropod communities in a grain crop rotation 89%
- Impacts of agrochemical intensification on the assembly and reassembly of a mainland-island model metacommunity 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.