The Role of the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Resolving Immediate and Carryover Semantic Interference During Picture Naming
Harvey, D. Y.; Stoll, H.; Hamilton, R. H.
Show abstract
Naming pictures from the same semantic category can interfere with subsequent word retrieval. Although the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) has been implicated in resolving this semantic interference, its causal role in this process remains unclear. Across three experiments, we investigated the contribution of the LIFG to interference resolution during blocked-cyclic naming. Experiment 1 tested whether continuous theta-burst stimulation over the LIFG increased semantic interference relative to vertex stimulation. Although the overall interference effect did not differ significantly between stimulation sites, exploratory analyses revealed an unexpected pattern based on the initial context (related vs. unrelated) with which items were named, suggesting that LIFG disruption affected retrieval of previously related items even when they were subsequently named in unrelated contexts. This observation motivated two further experiments examining the consequences of prior naming context more directly. Experiment 2 established that, without stimulation, interference observed in related blocks was no longer evident after the items were redistributed into unrelated blocks. Experiment 3 combined this design with cathodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the LIFG. Planned comparisons showed that cathodal stimulation slowed naming of initially related items both within related blocks and after redistribution into unrelated blocks; corresponding comparisons for items named consistently in unrelated blocks were not significant. The similar patterns across two stimulation methods suggest that LIFG-mediated control may influence both selection under current competition and subsequent retrieval of previously competing words. These findings could be accommodated within a hybrid account in which working memory supports context-guided selection and selection-related control helps recalibrate lexical accessibility, limiting the carryover of interference into subsequent naming.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Separable neural mechanisms support intentional forgetting and thought substitution 94%
- Dissociating activation and integration of discourse referents: evidence from ERPs and oscillations 93%
- Linguistic and attentional factors -not statistical regularities- contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing a causal role for left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in value-directed memory encoding with high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation 93%
- Age-related differences in the role of the prefrontal cortex in sensory-motor training gains: A tDCS study 92%
- Relationships between individual differences in dual process and electrophysiological signatures of familiarity and recollection during retrieval 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebellar theta and beta noninvasive stimulation rhythms differentially influence episodic memory versus language 95%
- Increased functional connectivity of the intraparietal sulcus underlies the attenuation of numerosity estimations for self-generated words 93%
- Lists with and without syntax: A new approach to measuring the neural processing of syntax 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.