The Flame Retardant Triphenyl Phosphate Induces Varying Responses in Genetically Diverse Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Armstrong, M.; Janeczko, K.; Dewey, H. B.; Czechanski, A.; Chen, Q.; Swanzey, E.; O'Connor, C.; Martin, W.; Aydin, S. B.; Munger, S. C.; Reinholdt, L. G.
Show abstract
Genetic variation impacts biological response to chemical and environmental exposures, contributing to differences in resistance or susceptibility. Forward genetic screens of genetically diverse cell populations can be used to identify the precise genetic variants that drive response variation. Cell lines from laboratory mouse genetic reference populations like the Diversity Outbred (DO) population are well powered for genetic mapping. Diverse stem cell panels are especially beneficial for studying early developmental effects of chemical exposures like triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), an organophosphate flame retardant linked to adverse developmental effects, including altered cell cycle in stem cells. Self-renewal and pluripotency are defining properties of stem cells during development; therefore, it is important to understand how chemicals like TPHP may alter these critical characteristics. To better understand the influence of genetic variation on TPHP exposure response, we utilized a genetically diverse panel of DO induced pluripotent stem cells (DO iPSCs). Our analyses characterize interline variation in gene expression through differential gene expression analysis and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping. We identified genomic loci that contribute to variation in gene expression following TPHP exposure, including a regulatory hotspot on chromosome 15. Gene set enrichment highlighted several pathways affected by TPHP including lipid metabolism, steroid hormone signaling, and cell cycle. Our study shows that genetic variation modulates the effects of TPHP on gene expression and cell cycle in stem cells. Additionally, our work demonstrates that genetically diverse cell panels like the DO iPSC resource offer a tractable and scalable approach for identifying the genetic determinants of chemical toxicity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Functional Genetic Components Modulating Toxicity Response to PFOS using Genome-wide CRISPR Screens in HepG2/C3A cells 93%
- Leveraging integrative toxicogenomic approach towards development of stressor-centric adverse outcome pathway networks for plastic additives 92%
- Alignment between Duplex Sequencing and transgenic rodent mutation assay data in the assessment of in vivo NDMA-induced mutagenesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmentally Relevant Lead Exposure Impacts Gene Expression in SH-SY5Y Cells Throughout Neuronal Differentiation 95%
- Comparative toxicogenomics of glyphosate and Roundup herbicides by mammalian stem cell-based genotoxicity assays and molecular profiling in Sprague-Dawley rats 94%
- Mixtures of phthalates disrupt expression of genes related to lipid metabolism and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling in mouse granulosa cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal Transfer of Environmentally Relevant Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) Produces a Diabetic Phenotype and Disrupts Glucoregulatory Hormones and Hepatic Endocannabinoids in Adult Mouse Female Offspring 93%
- DNA epigenetic marks are linked to reproductive aberrations in amphipods 92%
- Carcinogenicity and testicular toxicity of 2-bromopropane in a 26-week inhalation study using the rasH2 mouse model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toxicants Associated with Spontaneous Abortion in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) 94%
- Prenatal Exposure of Pesticide Mixtures and the Placental Transcriptome: Insights from Trimester-specific, Sex-Specific and Metabolite-Scaled Analyses in the SAWASDEE Cohort 93%
- Perinatal Exposure to Metal Mixtures Disrupts Neuronal Function and Behavior 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.