Back

Baseline severity of positive and negative symptoms predicts relapse in opposing directions among placebo-treated schizophrenia patients: analysis of five placebo-controlled, antipsychotic withdrawal, relapse-prevention trials

Rabinowitz, J.; Davidson, M.; Correll, C. U.; Speyer, H.; Ben-Shachar, M. S.; Noy, A.; Ciubara, A.; Luthringer, R.

2026-10-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.28.26363883 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Hypothesis Identifying which patients with schizophrenia will remain stable and which will relapse is relevant to both trial design and clinical practice. We hypothesized that higher negative and lower positive symptoms at baseline would predict longer time to relapse. Study Design This analysis pooled individual participant data on 557 patients with schizophrenia randomized to placebo from five placebo-controlled antipsychotic withdrawal relapse-prevention studies, each with a double-blind phase of at least 6 months. Relapse was defined as a [≥]12-point increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from double-blind baseline at any time during the double-blind phase. Cox regression analyses modeled time to relapse with the three PANSS subscales, age and sex. Study Results PANSS Negative and Positive symptom subscales predicted relapse in opposite directions and at almost equal magnitude in the pooled model. Higher negative symptoms predicted lower relapse risk (hazard ratio (HR)=0.94 per point, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.90-0.99) and higher positive symptoms predicted higher relapse risk (HR=1.06, 95% CI=1.00-1.13). PANSS General Psychopathology did not predict relapse (HR=0.98, 95% CI=0.95-1.02). Based on the pooled estimates, a 4-point higher baseline PANSS Positive score corresponded to a 27% higher relapse risk, while a 4-point higher baseline PANSS Negative score corresponded to a 21% lower risk. Conclusions These results may help predict relapse risk in clinical care and in clinical trial samples but require prospective validation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.