Back

Interpretable Automated Detection and Measurement of Dome-Shaped Macula on Optical Coherence Tomography

Yang, F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, B.; Yang, J.; Du, L.; Yu, C.; Chen, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; He, X.

2026-09-29 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.09.28.26356190 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To develop an interpretable automated pipeline for dome-shaped macula (DSM) detection and measurement from optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans. Methods: We analyzed one eye from each of 300 children aged 4-18 years in the Shanghai Child and Adolescent Large-scale Eye Study High Myopia (SCALE-HM) cohort (50 DSM-positive; 100 test eyes). A U-Net pretrained on OCTA-500 and fine-tuned on the development set segmented the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) boundary. A geometric module located the apex, fitted a tangent-line baseline, and computed perpendicular height in physical coordinates. An eye was DSM-positive if any gradable B-scan had height >= 50 um. Two masked graders evaluated the test set; a third adjudicated disagreements. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.927 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.850-0.986), sensitivity was 82.1% (95% CI, 64.4%-92.1%), and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 94.9%-100%) against the adjudicated reference. In concordant-positive eyes, automated height agreed with manual measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.949; mean absolute error, 6.9 um; bias, -5.7 um, versus Doctor A). Mean RPE-boundary error on pediatric test scans was 1.54 um. Conclusions: The pipeline may be considered a reliable and reproducible tool for automated DSM detection and height measurement on radial OCT, with each value traceable to landmarks on the source B-scan. External validation across populations, devices, and acquisition protocols is needed. Translational Relevance: The pipeline provides an objective and reproducible method to detect DSM and quantify dome height, width, and orientation across OCT meridians. Because each measurement can be verified on the source B-scan, it enables standardized DSM assessment.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.