Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Of Bacterial Isolates From Neonates With Sepsis At Livingstone University Teaching Hospital, Zambia

Background Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Its management is increasingly complicated by antimicrobial resistance (AMR), while limited facility-specific data on causative bacterial pathogens and susceptibility patterns often necessitate empirical antibiotic treatment. This study assessed the prevalence of neonatal sepsis, bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns, and maternal, neonatal and clinical factors associated with neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Zambia. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional record review was conducted among neonates admitted to the NICU at LUTH from 2020 to 2025. A total of 150 neonatal records were analysed. Neonatal, maternal, clinical, blood culture and antimicrobial susceptibility data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and logistic regression. Missing information was treated as missing and was not imputed; denominators were reported according to the records available for each analysis. Results Neonatal sepsis was identified in 52/150 neonates, giving a prevalence of 34.7% (95% CI: 27.5%-42.6%). Among the 52 sepsis cases, 20 had positive blood cultures, corresponding to a culture positivity rate of 38.5% (95% CI: 26.5%-52.0%); this represented 13.3% of the full study sample. Maternal fever during labour (aOR=6.822; 95% CI: 2.032-22.905; p=0.002) and caesarean delivery (aOR=2.245; 95% CI: 1.050-4.801; p=0.037) were independently associated with neonatal sepsis, while increasing birth weight was protective (aOR=0.891 per 100 g; 95% CI: 0.817-0.973; p=0.010). Escherichia coli was the most frequent isolate (5/20; 25.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (4/20; 20.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4/20; 20.0%). Resistance was highest to ampicillin (15/19; 78.9%), followed by gentamicin and ceftriaxone (10/19; 52.6% each), while all 19 isolates tested against meropenem were susceptible. Conclusion The findings indicate that empirical management of neonatal sepsis at LUTH should be informed by local microbiological surveillance rather than reliance on historical first-line susceptibility assumptions. Routine blood culture and susceptibility testing, a regularly updated facility antibiogram, strengthened infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship are required to improve treatment decisions and preserve effective antibiotics. Interpretation should consider the retrospective single-centre design, incomplete routine records and the small number of culture-positive isolates.