IQC: A Novel Criterion for Assessing Feature Selection Stability in High-Dimensional Analyses
Moxley, T. A.; Ridenhour, B. J.
Show abstract
In recent years, the issue of reproducibility in scientific studies has been at the forefront of scientific discussion. Many of these issues arise due to poor employment of statistical methods, making it crucial to address these knowledge gaps for frequently used methods. Elastic net regression (ENET) is one such algorithm used frequently in biology and public health due to its ability to select important predictors (also known as "features") from large data sets. However, ENET struggles with consistent feature selection and hyperparameter choice in these applications due to low observation counts and noisy data. This limitation hinders ENET's effectiveness in biological research due to low model reproducibility and predictor interpretability. We propose the Instability Quotient Criterion (IQC) as a metric to quantify the consistency of selected features for feature selection models such as ENET, with a specific emphasis on biological applications. IQC leverages ensemble modeling and Shannon's entropy in order to determine the stability of selected features derived from ENET models. We demonstrate IQC's robustness via simulation studies, showing that IQC is capable of detecting significant decreases in model stability with lower observation counts, higher dimensionality, and higher proportions of noisy signal. We additionally utilize simulation to provide a naive threshold for low versus high stability. Finally, we applied IQC to a case study to illustrate how our method can be integrated into a larger analysis pipeline when looking at microarray gene expression data. IQC indicated stability issues for differentially-expressed genes when classifying acute leukemia subtypes in spite of high classification success. Lastly, we discuss how model instability impedes interpretation of biologically significant genes for discerning cancer subtypes. Overall, we present IQC as a robust evaluation metric that can easily be incorporated into high-dimensional biological analyses.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Model guided trait-specific co-expression network estimation as a new perspective for identifying molecular interactions and pathways 94%
- Covering Hierarchical Dirichlet Mixture Models on binary data to enhance genomic stratifications in Onco-Hematology 94%
- Methodological Challenges in Translational Drug Response Modeling in Cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised dimension reduction for large-scale \"omics\" data with censored survival outcomes under possible non-proportional hazards 94%
- A New Family of Similarity Measures for Scoring Confidence of Protein Interactions using Gene Ontology 93%
- PAN: Personalized Annotation-based Networks for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Relapse 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.