Automated, Component-Level Assessment of a National Inpatient Diabetes Guideline: Adherence and Its Association with Hospitalization Complications Across Six Hospitals
Oded, S.; Shahar, Y.; Shalom, E.; Bashkin, A.; Saiegh, L.; Cantrell, D.; Wirsansky, I.; Badarne, M.; Barash, I.; Cahn, A.; Hochberg, I.
Show abstract
Objective: To measure adherence to a national inpatient hyperglycemia guideline at the level of its individual recommendations across a hospital network, to determine whether it changed after the guideline was issued, and to identify which recommendations track subsequent outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multicenter study of 48,354 admissions among 29,577 adults with diabetes or inpatient hyperglycemia at six Israeli general hospitals, August 2022 to December 2025. Each of 14 recommendations was formalized as a quality-assessment temporal pattern over knowledge-based temporal abstractions of the record, scored wherever it applied. Pre-post adherence was compared by Welch t-test with false discovery rate correction. Associations with 10 complications were estimated by bias-reduced logistic regression over 24-, 48-, and 72-hour windows, and by inverse probability of treatment weighting contrasting above- with at-or-below-median adherence. Results: Adherence ranged from near-universal admission and medication-management actions to substantial gaps in insulin management (means, 0.15-0.28). Overall adherence rose modestly after issue (0.682 to 0.703, P < .001), with marked inter-hospital heterogeneity. After weighting, above-median adherence carried 44% lower odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.514-0.603), 82% lower odds of hyperglycemia (OR, 0.175) and 52% lower odds of severe hyperglycemia (OR, 0.485), against 20% higher odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 1.204). Discussion: The least-implemented recommendations were largely those whose adherence tracked outcomes: repeated insulin decisions spread across a stay, rather than discrete actions on admission. Conclusion: Guideline adherence can be assessed automatically and per-recommendation at national scale, identifying where fuller implementation would most plausibly matter. Keywords: inpatient diabetes; clinical guideline adherence; quality assessment; temporal abstraction; electronic health records; propensity score; causal inference
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 91%
- Assessing the quality of clinical and administrative data extracted from hospitals: The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) experience 91%
- Causal modeling of chronic kidney disease in a participatory framework for informing the inclusion of social drivers in health algorithms 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 89%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 89%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 92%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 91%
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 94%
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 92%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.