Validation of behavioural tests for personality assessment in tie-stall dairy cows
Xu, X.; Cellier, M.; Aigueperse, N.; Diallo, A. B.; Vasseur, E.
Show abstract
The study of animal personality has gained increasing attention in recent years, as researchers recognize that non-human animals exhibit stable individual differences in behaviour. In dairy cattle, understanding personality traits holds potential for improving animal welfare, enhancing management practices, and supporting productivity outcomes. However, validating the behavioural tests used to assess these traits remains a significant challenge. The present study aimed to evaluate the consistency and validity of five commonly used behavioural tests in dairy cows: the Human Approach Test (HAT), Sudden Test (SUD), Novel Object Test (NOT), Open Field Test (OFT), and Novel Surface Test (NST). These tests were chosen for their potential to assess personality dimensions that parallel components of human personality, particularly Openness, Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Agreeableness. Repeated assessments were conducted across three time periods to evaluate both intra-test (temporal) and inter-test (contextual) consistency. Results revealed that only the SUD exhibited significant behavioural consistency across all periods, suggesting its potential as a reliable tool for personality assessment. Additionally, a moderate correlation between the HAT and SUD was observed, indicating that these tests may capture overlapping personality traits. In contrast, the remaining tests (NOT, OFT, NST) lacked consistent behavioural patterns over time and across contexts, raising questions about their reliability and the complexity of trait expression. These findings highlight the challenges of identifying stable personality traits in cattle and emphasize the need for more rigorous validation of behavioural tests. This research contributes to the growing field of animal personality by providing insights into trait stability, the limitations of current testing methods, and the potential application of personality assessment in future livestock management practices.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Residual feed intake in dairy ewes: an evidence of intraflock variability 94%
- Revealing the hidden social structure of pigs with AI assisted automated monitoring data and social network analysis 93%
- Welfare at group and individual level: optical flow patterns of broiler chicken flocks are correlated with the behaviour of individual birds 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in Behavior and Salivary Serum Amyloid A in cows with Subclinical Mastitis 94%
- Productive lifespan and resilience rank can be predicted from on-farm first parity sensor time series but not using a common equation across farms 94%
- Genetic and genomic analysis of early abortions in Israeli dairy cattle 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- In Pursuit of a Better Broiler: Growth, Efficiency and Mortality of 16 Strains of Broiler Chickens 91%
- Varying trypsin inhibitor activity in differently processed soybean expellers linearly reduces prececal amino acid digestibility in broilers 91%
- Effects of exogenous β-glucanase on ileal digesta soluble β-glucan molecular weight, digestive tract characteristics, and performance of coccidiosis challenged broiler chickens fed hulless barley-based diets with and without medication 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.