Back

Individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior are modulated by GRK2/3 inhibition in rats

Davila, S.; Starocelsky, C.; Pino, C.; Codocedo, F.; Guzman-Munoz, C.; Bossel, B.; Novoa, F.; Gonzalez, M.; Andres, M. E.; Gatica, R. I.

2026-10-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.25.753780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Purpose High novelty-seeking is an endophenotype associated with greater vulnerability to drug addiction, marked by a hyperdopaminergic state and reduced dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) levels in the dorsal striatum (DS). G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) regulate desensitization, internalization, and recycling of these receptors, including the D2R. This study investigated the relevance of GRK2 and 3 (GRK2/3) in novelty-seeking behavior and striatal dopamine dynamics. Experimental Approach Individual novelty-seeking trait was assessed in Sprague Dawley rats using an open-field test. D2R, GRK2, and GRK5 protein levels were measured in synaptosomal DS samples using Western Blot. Pharmacological inhibition of GRK2/3 was assessed using Cmpd101. We tested the effect of systemic Cmpd101 administration on contextual novelty discrimination and local Cmpd101 perfusion on baseline and stimulus-evoked extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the DS. Key Results Locomotor activity in a novel environment inversely correlated with the synaptosomal GRK2 and D2R protein levels in the DS. Systemic Cmpd101 treatment modulated the locomotor discrimination index in a novelty phenotype-dependent manner. Moreover, local Cmpd101 perfusion in the DS elicited a sustained elevation in basal extracellular dopamine levels and significantly blunted subsequent stimulus-evoked DA release, both effects independent of novelty-seeking phenotype. Conclusion and Implications Together, our findings link GRK2/3 signaling to individual differences in novelty-seeking and striatal dopaminergic function. These results suggest a potential relevance to drug addiction vulnerability.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.