Back

A Patient-Specific Framework for Separating Temporal Localization from Intracranial Waveform Reconstruction of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp EEG

Matsubara, T.; Koda, R.; Richardson, M.; Stufflebeam, S.

2026-09-28 neurology
10.64898/2026.09.25.26364055 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: We developed a patient-specific framework to determine which information about interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can be recovered from scalp EEG, separating temporal localization (where) from event-specific intracranial waveform reconstruction (what). Methods: Six subjects from a public simultaneous high-density scalp EEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) dataset were analyzed using patient-specific dual-branch convolutional-attention models integrating waveform/topographic and time-frequency representations. For the where task, a 640-ms scalp EEG segment was divided into eight 80-ms bins, and the model predicted the bin containing the intracranial IED peak. For the what task, a 250-ms peak-centered iEEG waveform was represented as a fixed patient-specific template plus an event-specific residual predicted from scalp EEG. Direct scalp-input controls and event-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals were used to distinguish scalp-dependent information from template-driven performance. Results: Where accuracy varied markedly across subjects (0.080-0.984), with an unweighted subject-level mean of 0.333 versus a chance level of 0.125; 95% confidence intervals were above chance level in three of six subjects. Input-control analyses supported a scalp-dependent contribution in subjects with successful localization. For the what task, mean waveform correlation was 0.752 for the model and 0.754 for the fixed patient-specific template (mean difference, -0.002), while residual correlations were generally modest (-0.020 to 0.378). Conclusion: Scalp EEG contained recoverable temporal information in some subjects, but event-specific single-contact morphology was not consistently recovered beyond the patient-specific template. Separating temporal localization from template-based waveform reconstruction provides a more stringent framework for evaluating noninvasive-to-intracranial inference and reduces conflation of prior-driven similarity with input-dependent reconstruction.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.