Back

Predicting suicide attempts in people with autism and co-morbid mood or psychotic disorders

Baker, M.; Lam, W.-Y.; Virtosu, M.; de Lacy, N.

2026-09-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.25.26364048 medRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and co-occurring mood or psychotic disorders face substantially elevated suicide-attempt risk, but prior research is largely limited to population-level incidence and cross-sectional risk-factor studies, leaving unclear whether individual-level, prospective prediction is possible in this population. We conducted a retrospective prediction model study using Epic Cosmos electronic health record (EHR) data from 322,879 individuals with ASD and co-occurring mood or psychotic disorders to predict suicide attempts at the next clinical encounter using only information available at or before the preceding encounter. Five machine-learning algorithms were compared, with performance evaluated across discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. All algorithms achieved strong discrimination using the full predictor set (AUROC 0.87-0.91). A parsimonious feature set (22 predictors) matched or exceeded full-model performance, with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieving the highest discrimination and standardized net benefit post-ablation (AUROC = 0.90; AUPRC = 0.34), though net benefit was comparable for elastic net and logistic regression. A prior suicide attempt was the strongest individual predictor. Decision-curve analysis indicated that model-guided decisions provided greater net benefit than treating all or no individuals across a broad range of clinically plausible thresholds. These findings demonstrate that near-term suicide-attempt risk can be predicted with high decision utility in this high-risk population using data already captured in routine care, suggesting a feasible basis for future EHR-based clinical decision-support tools.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.