Adolescent-Reported National Norms, Psychometrics, and Clinical Considerations for the Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS)
Nienaber, E. A.; Liu, Y. A.; Youngstrom, E. A.; Fristad, M. A.
Show abstract
Abstract Objective: The Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS) is a brief, public-domain, youth self-report measure designed for quality of life (QoL) reporting in measurement-based care (MBC). Preliminary psychometric support comes from a sample of treatment-seeking youth, but its use in a population-based sample has not been evaluated. This study examined the NQLS psychometric performance in a U.S. nationally representative sample and develops national norms, score interpretation guidance, and clinical significance benchmarks. Method: A nationally representative sample of 1,008 youth ages 12-18 completed the NQLS as part of a larger survey battery. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, validity, item response theory, and generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) norming. We integrated these results with clinical data from 1,200 youth seeking treatment at a large Midwestern children's hospital to estimate clinical significance benchmarks and compare between groups. Results: One- and two-factor solutions were evaluated. The NQLS demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity, with distinguishable 'life' and 'school' factors. Normative percentiles were generally stable across age, with modest narrowing at the youngest and oldest ages. Normative-sample youth showed raw score and latent trait estimates significantly higher than clinical-sample youth. Conclusions: The NQLS provides reliable and valid measurement of QoL in a nationally representative sample. Although two structural factors were identified, the composite score is recommended for clinical decision-making. National norms and clinical significance benchmarks may facilitate MBC applications of the NQLS. Future research should evaluate its performance across additional care settings. Keywords: Quality of life, assessment, psychometrics, youth, measurement-based care, norms
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Stress, coping, and quality of life in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Body image and appearance distress among military veterans and civilians with an injury-related visible difference: A comparison study 92%
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 90%
- Examining the relationship between adolescent health behaviors, brain health, and academic achievement using fNIRS 88%
- Transparency and Reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 91%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 91%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 92%
- Mapping domains of early-life determinants of future multimorbidity across three UK longitudinal cohort studies 90%
- Development and testing of a game-based digital intervention for working memory training in autism spectrum disorder 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 92%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 90%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.