Back

Pair-complete structural gating enables Pareto optimization of de novo cyclic peptides with preserved binding geometry and improved developability

Hou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Peng, X.; Liu, Z.; Yusupujiang, M.; Xu, Y.; Hu, J.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.

2026-09-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.24.754053 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyclic peptides can engage extended protein interfaces, but sequence changes that improve developability often disrupt the selected target-bound geometry. Existing property-guided design methods lack a principled way to preserve this geometry during local multiproperty optimization. Here we present RF-PepTune, which separates structural eligibility from property prioritization. Before any property score is queried, RF-PepTune evaluates single substitutions and all position-distinct pairs induced by admitted substitutions to build a parent-specific, pair-complete admission graph. Pareto Monte Carlo tree search then optimizes predicted permeability, solubility, non-fouling, and low-haemolysis scores exclusively within this graph, and selected sequences undergo full structural re-evaluation. In a matched three-arm comparison of 334 parents across MDM2, GABARAP, and MCL1, joint property-structure success rose from 10.2% without admission to 51.5% with single-substitution admission and 77.5% with pair-complete admission; pair-complete gating improved success by 26.0 percentage points over single-substitution gating (95% CI, 20.7-31.4). Property-positive but structure-failing endpoints fell from 88.3% to 9.3%. In a separate target-balanced set, all 90 prioritized outputs improved all four model-native scores while satisfying prespecified structural criteria. This work establishes pairwise structural gating as a general strategy for constrained multi-objective molecular optimization.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.