PhysioFusion: A Multi-Modal Ensemble using Static Preoperative Variables and Time Series Intraoperative Data to Predict Adverse Events Following Cardiothoracic Surgery
Korutla, R.; Hicks, A.; Milosevic, M.; Kulkarni, D.; Mazhude, F.; Kelting, T.; Rabb, J. B.; Jin, Q.; Kramer, R.; Sawyer, D.; Winslow, R. L.; Amal, S.
Show abstract
Accurate prediction of adverse events in the intensive care unit (ICU) following cardiothoracic surgery is crucial for timely interventions, improving patient outcomes and optimizing value in healthcare. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, this study demonstrates the transformative potential of predictive analytics to enhance postoperative care using a dataset from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' (STS) database and time-series intraoperative data. We developed a multi-modal late fusion approach integrating static patient variables with intraoperative time-series data, utilizing an ensemble of models including residual neural networks for static features, CNN and Bidirectional GRU for time-series processing, XGBoost, logistic regression, SVM and Gradient Boosting. Through five-fold cross-validation, our ensemble model with balanced threshold selection achieved an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.76, specificity of 0.83, PPV of 0.40, and NPV of 0.96. Preoperative heart failure, IABP insertion, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration and white blood cell (WBC) count emerged as key predictors. Training the same pipeline on each modality separately showed that the static registry variables alone reached the same AUC of 0.87, and that the intraoperative signals alone reached 0.83, so on this cohort the two modalities act as substitutes rather than complements and fusion changed the sensitivity and precision trade-off rather than the amount of separable signal. A per-signal ablation found that no individual monitoring channel was load bearing, with mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure the least substitutable. This balanced approach optimizes the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, providing a screening tool with high negative predictive value for monitoring high-risk patients, and the modality comparison indicates that comparable performance is attainable at sites holding registry data alone.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU 94%
- CT-based Rapid Triage of COVID-19 Patients: Risk Prediction and Progression Estimation of ICU Admission, Mechanical Ventilation, and Death of Hospitalized Patients 94%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 94%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Personalized Predictive Models for Symptomatic COVID-19 Patients Using Basic Preconditions: Hospitalizations, Mortality, and the Need for an ICU or Ventilator 93%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 92%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.