Unifying Vision and Language: Benchmarking End to End Transformer Model Against the ClipCap Framework
Anand, S.; M S, D.; Dekker, A.; Wee, L. Y.
Show abstract
Background and purpose: Accurate identification of cardiac MRI volume orientations is essential for reliable image interpretation and for enabling downstream automated analysis pipelines. However, orientation labels and commonly assigned manually, making the process time-consuming and prone to variability. Recent advances in vision-language models offers new opportunities for automated label generation by jointly modeling visual and semantic information. Methods: In this study, we systematically compare a conventional end-to-end transformer-based captioning model with a CLIPCap architecture for automated cardiac MRI view labelling. Both models were evaluated on a dataset of 1184 de-identified cardiac MR images spanning across six clinically relevant orientations: short axis, two-, three-, four-chamber views, left and right ventricular outflow tract views. The caption transformer was trained from scratch, whereas CLIPCap leveraged pretrained CLIP image embeddings combined with lightweight mapping network and a frozen language model. Results: Experimental results demonstrate a substantial performance advantage from CLIPCap, which achieved an overall accuracy of 98% compared to 68% for the caption transformer. CLIPCap consistently delivered high precision and recall across all orientation classes, including those of high clinical importance, while the end to end transformer exhibited unstable performance and complete failure in certain views. Conclusion: These findings highlight the benefits of leveraging large scale multimodal pretrained model for medical image labeling tasks, particularly in data limited settings. The study suggests that CLIPCap provides a more robust and clinically reliable solution for automated cardiac MRI orientation labeling, supporting its integration into efficient and scalable clinical workflows.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated 3D reconstruction of the fetal thorax in the standard atlas space from motion-corrupted MRI stacks for 21-36 weeks GA range 94%
- MISPEL: A supervised deep learning harmonizationmethod for multi-scanner neuroimaging data 92%
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 93%
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 92%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 95%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 94%
- Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Based Cardiac Cine Segmentation – Transfer Learning Application to 7T Ultrahigh-Field MRI 96%
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 92%
- Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-based and AI-based Denoising 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.