Back

Volatile Metabolic Signatures Reveal Early Pulmonary Responses to PFAS Exposure

Agorsor, P.-I.; Lin, T.-C.; Huang, Y.-W.; Eze, M. O.

2026-09-24 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.23.753921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inhalation of airborne per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represents an important yet understudied exposure route. While volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been widely explored as biomarkers of toxicant exposure, their potential for early detection of PFAS-induced pulmonary toxicity remains largely unexplored. This study investigated VOC profiles in human alveolar (A549) and bronchial (BEAS-2B) epithelial cells following exposure to environmentally relevant PFAS concentrations (1, 5, and 10 ppb) for 12, 24, and 48 h. VOCs were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-Orbitrap mass spectrometry. We observed significant concentration- and time-dependent alterations in VOC profiles in both cell models. The principal VOCs associated with PFAS exposure include butanal, acetone, 2-butanone, 2-nonanone, (E)-2-nonenal, (E)-2-octenal, (E)-2-heptenal, 2,4-heptadienal, 2,4-nonadienal, 2,4-decadienal, 1-pentanol, and 1-hexanol. Cell type-specific regulations were observed, reflecting differential metabolic responses between transformed and non-transformed lung epithelial cells. Metabolite set enrichment analysis indicated perturbations in ketone body metabolism, consistent with altered cellular energy metabolism. Complementary qPCR analysis revealed altered expressions of CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH1A1, and ALDH2, supporting a mechanistic link between PFAS exposure and oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and impaired aldehyde detoxification. These findings demonstrate that VOC profiling, combined with transcriptional analysis, can reveal PFAS-induced metabolic perturbations in pulmonary epithelial cells.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.