A plasma metabolomics workflow for breast cancer detection using quantitative GC/MS and machine learning
Ojima, N.; Yokoyama, T.; Nishiumi, S.; Kikuchi, S.; Yoneda, K.; Kimura, M.; Tanaka, K.; Morimoto, M.; Miyazaki, A.; Tomita, T.; Ohyanagi, M.; Nagahashi, M.; Miyoshi, Y.; Ikeda, M.
Show abstract
Blood-based metabolomic profiling has been widely investigated for breast cancer (BC) detection; however, clinical implementation remains limited due to variability in sample handling, analytical reproducibility, and overfitting during statistical analysis. We established a plasma GC/MS metabolomics workflow for discriminating BC from healthy controls (HC) using conventional machine-learning algorithms. Plasma samples (n = 360; BC = 180, HC = 180) were collected prospectively under standardized preanalytical conditions before surgery and the initiation of systematic anticancer therapy and analyzed using a quantitative GC/MS platform with automated derivatization. Feature selection and model development were conducted using three machine-learning (ML) algorithms (Lasso logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), and support vector machine (SVM)). A total of 45 metabolite candidate biomarkers were identified, and the optimal number of metabolite features for each algorithm was estimated by a recursive feature elimination (RFE)-based strategy. The best-performing models achieved area under the ROC curve values (AUC) of 0.910 (LR), 0.893 (RFC), and 0.843 (SVM). We selected prioritizing candidate biomarkers consistently expressed across the multi-algorithm pipeline. A bagging ensemble model improved stability (AUC = 0.911) and reduced false-positive predictions in the independent HC dataset. In addition, model stability with respect to false-positive predictions was assessed using an independent HC cohort (n = 15) that was collected at a separate institution. These results indicate that a plasma metabolomics workflow combined with conventional multi-algorithm ML, algorithm-specific feature selection, and independent assessment provides stable discrimination between BC and HC in a moderately sized cohort.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-chemokine gene expression signature for clinical use in a CLIA laboratory 92%
- A simple liquid 3D cell culture paradigm models oxidative mitochondrial metabolism of epithelial breast cancer cells with relevance for lung metastases. 90%
- Branched-chain amino acid catabolism promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation via phosphorylation of mTOR 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new pipeline for the normalization and pooling of metabolomics data 92%
- Optimized Mass Spectrometry Detection of Thyroid Hormones and Polar Metabolites in Rodent Cerebrospinal Fluid 92%
- Untargeted lipidomics of non-small cell lung carcinoma shows differentially abundant lipid classes in cancer vs non-cancer tissue 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted transcript quantification in single disseminated cancer cells after whole transcriptome amplification 92%
- Feasibility of Integrating Canine Olfaction with Chemical and Microbial Profiling of Urine to Detect Lethal Prostate Cancer 92%
- Untargeted saliva metabolomics reveals COVID-19 severity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Screening for Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Detection and Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells 94%
- The differential metabolic signature of breast cancer cellular response to olaparib treatment 92%
- Altered plasma, urine, and tissue profiles of sulfatides and sphingomyelins in patients with renal cell carcinoma 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.