Back

A plasma metabolomics workflow for breast cancer detection using quantitative GC/MS and machine learning

Ojima, N.; Yokoyama, T.; Nishiumi, S.; Kikuchi, S.; Yoneda, K.; Kimura, M.; Tanaka, K.; Morimoto, M.; Miyazaki, A.; Tomita, T.; Ohyanagi, M.; Nagahashi, M.; Miyoshi, Y.; Ikeda, M.

2026-09-28 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.09.23.753710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Blood-based metabolomic profiling has been widely investigated for breast cancer (BC) detection; however, clinical implementation remains limited due to variability in sample handling, analytical reproducibility, and overfitting during statistical analysis. We established a plasma GC/MS metabolomics workflow for discriminating BC from healthy controls (HC) using conventional machine-learning algorithms. Plasma samples (n = 360; BC = 180, HC = 180) were collected prospectively under standardized preanalytical conditions before surgery and the initiation of systematic anticancer therapy and analyzed using a quantitative GC/MS platform with automated derivatization. Feature selection and model development were conducted using three machine-learning (ML) algorithms (Lasso logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), and support vector machine (SVM)). A total of 45 metabolite candidate biomarkers were identified, and the optimal number of metabolite features for each algorithm was estimated by a recursive feature elimination (RFE)-based strategy. The best-performing models achieved area under the ROC curve values (AUC) of 0.910 (LR), 0.893 (RFC), and 0.843 (SVM). We selected prioritizing candidate biomarkers consistently expressed across the multi-algorithm pipeline. A bagging ensemble model improved stability (AUC = 0.911) and reduced false-positive predictions in the independent HC dataset. In addition, model stability with respect to false-positive predictions was assessed using an independent HC cohort (n = 15) that was collected at a separate institution. These results indicate that a plasma metabolomics workflow combined with conventional multi-algorithm ML, algorithm-specific feature selection, and independent assessment provides stable discrimination between BC and HC in a moderately sized cohort.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.