Back

Conditional Growth References for Vietnamese Children: Quantile Regression of Growth Distributions and Phenotypes

Ho, N. T.

2026-09-24 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.09.23.26363771 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objective. The WHO growth reference judges a child's height against the population at one age, without using the child's own earlier growth. This study built and validated a quantile regression based conditional growth reference predicting a child's future height for age distribution from early growth status. Methods. Using deidentified longitudinal annual school children health check data from three major cities in Vietnam, this study linked a baseline height and BMI for age Z score near age 6 to outcome visits near age 12 or 15 in 4,857 children. A linear quantile regression and a pooled quantile generalized additive model, fit by sex, were compared against a linear benchmark and a naive persistence model on a held out test set, using pinball loss, interval coverage, and width against the WHO 90% band. This study also tested adding growth phenotype and checked generalization across the three cities. Results. The pooled model outperformed the discrete quantile regression in every group. Every individualized 90% interval was narrower than the WHO band, by 34.6 to 54.5%. Growth phenotype improved accuracy in most groups. The model generalized well to a held out Hanoi or Haiphong but poorly to a held out Ho Chi Minh City, where coverage fell to between 0.35 and 0.52, though the all-city model stayed well calibrated for Ho Chi Minh City itself. Conclusion. Conditional quantile modeling gives individualized growth predictions markedly narrower than a fixed population reference and gains further from growth phenotype, but needs local validation before use at an unrepresented site.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.