Back

Expanding N-terminomics Coverage by Extending N-terminal Peptide Length

Takeshita, A.; Kanao, E.; Imami, K.; Ishihama, Y.

2026-09-23 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.22.753420 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In bottom-up proteomics, protease specificity determines peptide length and LC/MS/MS detectability; in N-terminomics, this is critical because each protein N-terminal peptide is unique and cannot be substituted by other peptides. CHromatographic AMplification of Protein N-terminal peptides (CHAMP-N) combines LysargiNase digestion with StageTip-based strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX), removing internal peptides by exploiting their newly generated N-terminal Lys/Arg residues and thereby selectively isolating protein N-terminal peptides. However, LysargiNase cleavage near the protein N-terminus can generate excessively short peptides. Here, we developed two complementary CHAMP-N approaches that modurate N-terminal peptide length while retaining the charge-based SCX separation principle. LysN digestion avoided cleavage at N-terminal-proximal Arg residues, whereas D3-acetylation blocked Lys cleavage by LysargiNase to produce ArgN-like specificity. Both approaches extended otherwise short N-terminal peptides while preserving N-terminal basic residues on internal peptides. Conventional LysargiNase, LysN, and ArgN-like CHAMP-N generated complementary sets of N-terminal peptides. Integration of the three workflows identified 2,552 protein N-termini, approximately twice the number identified by conventional CHAMP-N alone. The median relative standard deviations of N-terminal peptide intensities were approximately 15% for all three workflows, indicating comparable technical reproducibility. These results demonstrate that coordinating protease cleavage specificity with SCX selectivity reduces sequence-dependent losses and expands N-terminome coverage while preserving the simplicity and reproducibility of CHAMP-N.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.