Perfect 21-nucleotide matches to beneficial fungi are common in canonical antifungal dsRNA targets: an in-silico off-target hazard screen for spray-induced gene silencing
Wasif, M.; Tarcali, G.; Khan, M. A.; Saleem, H.; Azmat, M. A.
Show abstract
Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) biopesticides that silence essential fungal genes by spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS) are advancing towards registration, underpinned by the claim that silencing is confined to sequence-matched target organisms, a claim that has never been tested systematically against beneficial fungi. We screened twelve dsRNA constructs (the whole transcripts of eleven canonical antifungal target genes of Fusarium graminearum: three CYP51 sterol 14-demethylases, six chitin synthases and two {beta}-tubulins, plus a concatenation of the three CYP51 transcripts modelling the flagship CYP3RNA design) for perfect 21-nucleotide (21-nt) identity, the primary match criterion of recent regulatory bioinformatics frameworks, against the transcriptomes of seven non-target fungi, including commercial biocontrol agents (Trichoderma harzianum, T. virens, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, M. brunneum), the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eleven of the twelve constructs carried off-target hazard; only CYP51C was completely clean. TUB2b carried 580 perfect 21-nt matches and contained no hazard-free window of 250 consecutive 21-mer start positions, whereas 26.6-60.0% of screened windows were hazard-free in the designable genes. Hits landed overwhelmingly on orthologues of the targeted gene and concentrated in the Hypocreales; R. irregularis and S. cerevisiae were nearly clean. These are hazard findings, not risk findings: perfect siRNA-length matches to beneficial fungi are common in canonical antifungal dsRNA targets, and current regulatory screening panels contain no fungus that would detect them.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fusarium graminearum DICER-like-dependent sRNAs are required for the suppression of host immune genes and full virulence 89%
- Host Induced Gene Silencing of the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ABHYDROLASE-3 gene reduces disease severity in Brassica napus 88%
- Linnemannia elongata (Mortierellaceae) stimulates Arabidopsis thaliana aerial growth and responses to auxin, ethylene, and reactive oxygen species 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a bioassay guided genome mining approach for antifungal natural product discovery from pseudomonads 91%
- Apoplastic effector candidates of a foliar forest pathogen trigger cell death in host and non-host plants 90%
- CRISPR-Based Transcriptional Activation Tool for Silent Genes in Filamentous Fungi 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study on the efficacy of dsRNAs with increasing length in RNAi-based silencing of the Fusarium CYP51 genes 92%
- Intron-assisted, viroid-based production of insecticidal circular double-stranded RNA in Escherichia coli 89%
- rG4-seeker enables high-confidence identification of novel and non-canonical rG4 motifs from rG4-seq experiments 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative genomics of Alternaria species provides insights into the pathogenic lifestyle of Alternaria brassicae - a pathogen of the Brassicaceae family 89%
- Long-insert sequence capture detects high copy numbers in a defence-related beta-glucosidase gene Betaglu-1 with large variations in white spruce but not Norway spruce 88%
- A catalog of CasX genome editing sites in common model organisms 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bdelloid rotifers use hundreds of horizontally acquired genes against fungal pathogens 88%
- Alternative splicing regulation in plants by effectors of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi 88%
- Genomic signatures of somatic hybrid vigor due to heterokaryosis in the oomycete pathogen, Bremia lactucae. 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.